this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

Formula 1

10468 readers
31 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


πŸ“† F1 Calendar
🏁 FIA Documents
πŸ“Š F1 Pace


2025 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Brazil 07-09 Nov
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 20-22 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 28-30 Nov
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 05-07 Dec

Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
  8. No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] klz@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

I can see a few reasons why I think red bull won't be against this.

  1. They believe they have the best drive on the grid. Put everyone in identical cars and Max still probably wins everything
  2. They believe their aero package is better than anyone else
  3. They were helped by a similar thing a few years ago when Honda was dropping engine manufacturing. Paying back the karma
  4. Helps keep costs down. Making an engine be as good as everyone else is significantly easier than making an engine better than everyone else. There becomes a point when it is exponentially harder to increase performance