this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
657 points (99.1% liked)

Comic Strips

14135 readers
3049 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Well, for thot pics, there’s always more jpeg. For everything else, there’s lossless data formats.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Even with jpeg, you only lose data each time it's encoded. If you save the file instead of taking a screenshot, the quality remains the same.

That said, I don't know if there's a digital storage method widely used that will last longer than a book without some sort of active aspect to the storage (like copying the files to a new medium every now and then).

I think punch cards are one that can, but they aren't used much anymore due to poor density and speed, plus being susceptible to literal bugs. It's possible to encode digital information into carved rock, but that would also have density issues (higher density means less reliability because the amount of damage required to make it unreadable is lower).

I think there's a good chance that a lot of the knowledge we have today could be lost entirely if civilization collapses to a certain degree just due to how we store it.

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

We have stone tablets from back when humans invebted written language. I vote we back up critical data using this method.

[–] moopet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

You mean we should consider recording information on silicon?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)