this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
168 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

  • Nissan's pride and denial hindered merger talks, sources say
  • Honda pushed Nissan for deeper cuts to jobs, factory capacity, sources say
  • Nissan unwilling to consider factory closures, sources say
  • Honda's proposal to make Nissan a subsidiary caused tensions, sources say
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (12 children)

And Honda was working on hydrogen nearly 30 years ago now

Unless they have a fusion reactor they're not telling us about, so that they can electrolyze water hydrogen is never going to be a viable power source. Currently all hydrogen is acquired through fracking, which makes the entire exercise somewhat pointless.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I think hydrogen has a future, but more for long haul trucking than personal cars. The general idea is to generate a ton of solar power during the day and use the excess to produce hydrogen, and then use the hydrogen to fuel heavy equipment, trucks, and cover for low solar production days.

This solves many of the issues with hydrogen:

  • no need to transport hydrogen, just use it locally
  • wasting energy for production is fine because it would be wasted anyway
  • only used in heavy equipment, so no need to sell the public on it
[–] Patch@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Hydrogen remains a solution desperately in search of a problem.

If your aim is to generate locally, why not just use batteries? They're cheaper, more efficient, and more reliable. Why have the lossy and very high maintenance electrolysis and hydrogen storage/transfer process involved?

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Battery-powered vehicles require an unreasonable amount of water to control a fire. 1 burning Tesla needs 1 fire truck of water, so imagine what a bigger vehicle would need.

I don't think the size of the vehicle matters, but where it's placed. A sufficiently large battery (e.g. something powering a warehouse) is unlikely to be right next to a bunch of important stuff, so they'll just let it burn out. A Tesla, however, is much more likely to be next to a bunch of other cars, so they need to contain it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)