this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
510 points (96.0% liked)

Antiwork

4206 readers
221 users here now

Date Created: June 21, 2023

This community supports labor, with an aspiration for it to cease to be required to live our lives. Members of this community want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and/or want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! Some of the more talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules


The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/


2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments


Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.


3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved


Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.


4. Educate don’t attack


No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.


5. No Advertising


Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service


6. No factually misleading information


Content that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.


7. Headlines


If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.


8. Staff Discretion


Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


9. No posting links to Twitter/X or Meta owned properties


Social Media products such as Twitter/X and Meta Properties (e.g. Facebook, Instagram, Threads) are known low quality information sources - they actively spread misinformation without sufficient moderation, hate speech. These platforms each have billionaire owners working actively to eliminate labor protections through direct action, lobbying, performative large scale layoffs and attacks on institutions that enforce labor law.

You are not encouraged to do so, but you may post screenshots from these sites IF THE INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE ON ANOTHER VALID PLATFORM. Screenshots must include info to support a relevant conversation within this community and must show a VISIBLE time/date stamp for posterity. If you are caught manipulating content of a screenshot, your post will be removed and you will receive an indefinite ban from this community at the discretion of the moderator(s)

No pass through/archive services are allowed as they potentially feed traffic back to these services, directly or indirectly (e.g. Services like Xcancel or Nitter)



Antiwork Suggested Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

Active stats from all Antiwork instances

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I personally think it's capitalism that's to blame, not landlords. I have generally been lucky with having nice landlords though, who aren't bastards.

[–] thisismyname@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, landlords do the things they do because of capitalism. Their existence is due to capitalism. But that doesn't mean they're not to blame. They choose to be landlords.

Your anecdotal experience of nice landlords doesn't cover the fact that landlords, traditionally, have been bastards to their tenants. There's a reason many countries have had to implement laws like third party deposit schemes and standards for things like smoke alarms, heating systems, etc in rented accommodation.

Landlords are bastards because of capitalism but that doesn't wash away the fact that landlords are bastards.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Okay, but "ACAB" makes sense because even the "good" cops enable the bad system. But how does ALAB make sense? The good landlords are just... good landlords. The landlord performs a useful service by buying and renting out the property which would be too expensive for renters to otherwise have access to. Obviously things would be better if there weren't a need for landlords, but that's hardly the fault of the landlord. What exactly is the (good) landlord doing that is enabling a bad system overall?

[–] thisismyname@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hoarding living accommodation for the purpose of profit.

Landlording for an office or shop could perhaps be justified to be for-profit but housing is a human requirement and hoarding it for-profit is unethical. All landlords are bastards, unless by some unlikely chance they're running their business as a nonprofit.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There are other human requirements too, but it's only landlords that get the bad press.

Monkey paw, there are no landlords -- now almost nobody can afford to live anywhere. For this reason, shouldn't one blame the housing market (and all its participants) as a whole, not just the ones who rent out their properties?

Of course, if we can socialize housing, or at least require that if you own a house you must live in it, that would be the best. But in the meantime, I don't really see the objective problem that landlords specifically are causing, they seem to be doing a service to everyone as far as I can tell. I blame the high price of housing instead.

load more comments (3 replies)