In my limited testing, exporting as a JPG can sometimes lead to a smaller file size than exporting to WEBP. Not always. I'm not sure if there is just some "point of diminishing returns" or whatever where JPG actually becomes more efficient or what.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

WebP can be either lossless or lossy. These two modes achieve objectively better compression than PNG or JPEG, respectively. Obviously, you need to pay attention to the settings to get the best file size for your use case.

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

That is actually something I really dislike. Lossless and lossy formats should be immediately distinguishable.

load more comments (1 replies)