this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
157 points (98.2% liked)

Ukraine

8740 readers
477 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

💳💥 Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

💳⚕️⛑️ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

🪖 🫡 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Russia attacked, but they shouldn't have let him attack," he said.

🤡

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe if they kept those nuclear weapons instead of believing America would follow the Budapest Memorandum...

That’s one of the things that blows me away here: nobody in the halls of power of any country that professes to care about stopping nuclear proliferation did ANYTHING to backstop the the guarantees of the Budapest Memorandum. That has had the direct result of making it clear to every single country on earth that the deal was bullshit to begin with. Nuclear non-proliferation is dead.

Nuclear weapons are the final word in guaranteeing sovereignty and territorial integrity. Any country concerned about either of those things from anywhere, at any point in the future (Ukraine + anyone non- NATO and non-nuclear on Russia’s border; Japan; Taiwan; South Korea; Jordan; Egypt; Cuba; Canada; Mexico) should absolutely strive for their own nuclear program these days, or at the very least join a pact that pledges mutual defense.