this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
497 points (98.3% liked)

Canada

9366 readers
1916 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (8 children)

You don't have to do that. Remove tariffs on Chinese EVs, and the market will ruin Tesla on its own.

[–] samuelazers@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wow, no kidding, we have 100% tarrifs on chinese EV and 25% chinese aluminium.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-china-electric-vehicles-1.7486204

If it comes to it, Canadians might have to seek alliance with China, and that's something neither americans nor canadians really want.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yea let’s not do what we always do by switching from one bad thing to the thing we know is worse because “change” while better solutions exist. China also threatens sovereignty, supplies Russia, and even works with North Korea. They have even worse labour issues than the US does, though oddly they seem to do alright with trans rights. The concentration camps for Uyghurs does offset that last bit, though.

I wish we had more brains than “frying pan hot, must jump into fire”.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

switching from one bad thing to the thing we know is worse

How is an EV worse because of its nation of origin?

China also threatens sovereignty, supplies Russia, and even works with North Korea.

China is in no way impugning on Canadian sovereignty. They're doing business with Russia just like every single other Asiatic Nation, from South Korea to India to Turkyie - none of which are undergoing comparable sanctions.

Which is particularly galling, given that South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol used "Secret North Korean election interference" as his excuse to launch a coup on Parliament just a couple of months ago.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China also has detained Canadian citizens several times in the past and it has been major issues trying to get them back here. That alone probably isn’t enough to warrant such extreme sanctions, but their disregard for many human rights is a problem we all face unless we’re shitty, selfish, nationalist assholes at which point that opinion ceases to hold much weight.

South Korea showed us that when someone in power tries to do a crazy thing the country as a wholw will actually do something to stop them. Yoon Suk Yeol was impeached and that whole thing is still ongoing, with the court to rule on that on Friday so I’m not sure why you think that’s a gotcha.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

China also has detained Canadian citizens

In Beijing, while operating as intelligence assets to the detriment of the country.

Kovrig was considered an intelligence asset, as a diplomatic officer at the Global Security Reporting Program (GSRP) within the Canadian embassy in Beijing, and later when based in Hong Kong at International Crisis Group, according to a 2023 report

This appears to be in direct response to the Canadian arrest and prosecution of Huawei's chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, who was visiting Canada on business and was arrested with intent to extradite her to the US. That arrest was in pursuit of a US sanction against Iran, another country whose people were chronically subjected to infiltratation, sabotage, and assassination by Western security and paramilitary forces.

What this had to do with Canadian Sovereignty is not clear. Are Canadian spies arrested on Chinese soil in reprisal for the seizure and extradition of a Chinese businesswoman a threat to Canadian Independence? Because it seems to be the absolute opposite.

South Korea showed us that when someone in power tries to do a crazy thing the country as a wholw will actually do something to stop them

The South of Korea has been under occupation by American military and intelligence services since the 1950s. This particular president's coup attempt threatened the interests of American State officials, so the Korean military friendly with the US allowed the coup to fail. But the parliament has done little to curb a future Yoon or Park administration from returning to power in the next election cycle, under a far more coup-favorable Trump State Department.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is we probably need one of them? Their economies are massive and America's by far the biggest. Unless we want our economy to shrink. Like it or not they are the two biggest fish in the pond.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So we strengthen our connections with Europe, then, and ourselves. Yes, it will be harder than just flip-flopping between two bad options but that is literally the point I’m trying to make.

Look at our current setup: The Conservatives are garbage and the only good things the Liberals seem to do are things that the coalition with the NDP forced them to do. The NDP, however, is treated like they’re a non-starter option because they have fewer seats even though they got more than half of the Liberal or Conservative votes even with strategic voting being a thing. The Bloc got more seats while having slightly more than half the NDP votes.

We just keep bouncing between terrible options like stupid little reactionaries because it feels easier than doing anything that will genuinely help us.

load more comments (6 replies)