Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

15037 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate. This is strongly encouraged!

Cross-posting

!everything_git@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!docker@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!portainer@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!fediverse@lemmy.ml is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
!selfhosted@lemmy.ml is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Zoe8338@lemmy.ml

dogmuffins@lemmy.ml

testman@lemmy.ml

[Question] If you want to have two environments (lets call it Sandbox and Production), and you want to have a NAS in Production (Terramaster, Ugreen, etc), what do you put in your Sandbox environment? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by Campers@lemmy.world to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am trying to plan my home lab to satisfy two different needs:

I want a stable environment where I will put a relatively expensive NAS and maybe some other Zima boards.
I also want to try new versions and configurations in an env where I can break stuff BEFORE trying things on my Production environment. I would also like to use that environment to try other things like playing with Kubernetes, Docker, Iceberg, etc. I am a backend software engineer so this is very useful to me. Besides being fun.

So, I am just trying to gather ideas on how to configure this both in terms of software and hardware.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Identical or very similar set up for production and testing. Testing doubles as on site back up for me.

[–] Campers@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh... That sounds risky!

But, with no experience doing it, I may be missing something.

Have you had no issues with this approach?

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No issues and it's something I've done for a long time but it is adding extra overhead for a problem that using docker has largely solved for me re stable environments.