this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
467 points (99.2% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

880 readers
1221 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/HumusSapien At 2025-04-10 08:59:46 AM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] emberinmoss@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yes. Either him or AOC would have been great. It's not okay that they were blocked. I'm not okay with it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

AOC was blocked until now by not being at least 35 years old. Approve of that condition or not, at least it's legitimately in the Constitution (unlike the bullshit that torpedo'd Sanders).

[–] cenzorrll@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm ok with the 35 year old limit, I do think someone needs a good amount of life experience before leading a country. I also support limiting it at a max of 65 years.

Old enough to see some shit, young enough that your decisions affect your own life

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)