this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
100 points (91.0% liked)

Technology

71502 readers
4814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As part of the agreement, Telegram will receive $300 million in cash and equity from xAI. Telegram will also receive 50 percent of revenue from xAI subscriptions sold via its platform.

Edit: Looks like the deal changed rather quickly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Not certain and doesn't make him an angel.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Definitively certain and I didn’t call anyone an angel, so no idea why bring such a thing up.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Well if anything such obviously advertising him as a fighter against the regime, while Telegram is not banned in Russia, is definitively certain for you - just go on.

[–] weirdcarrotmonster@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Telegram is not banned in Russia in the same way YouTube isn't. They fight it by attempting to decrease service quality, prompting users to switch platforms. In last few months connectivity without VPN degraded noticeably. It just happens that since it's official ban (2018-2020) telegram evolved to be pretty resilient to blocking, and it's easier to declare "yeah we signed a deal with Durov he works with us now, unbanned" than look like fools while blocking 1% of all IPv4 addresses (im not kidding) with no result.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Not true. There was a period it wasn't possible to use Telegram without VPNs. That's in the past.

What shows their alignment best is that Russian state propaganda feels right at home in TG, while counterpropaganda channels from time to time get banned without explanation.

YouTube just plainly doesn't work in Russia, its pages load, videos don't.

The reason they say stuff about "degrading caching servers" and whatever other bullshit they say is to reduce visibility of their actions from the general population. It's smart, not stupid. I thought it's dumb that they always lie this way, until I realized that most of said lie sticks subconsciously, and the saved expenses at controlling the population add up. It's like saving every dime being virtuous in the Protestant approach to life.

They could ban it completely.

than look like fools while blocking 1% of all IPv4 addresses (im not kidding) with no result.

They did look like fools, but the "no result" part is just not true, the result was achieved. Telegram didn't evolve, it works the same as before, a typical client-server application.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)