this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
3 points (58.8% liked)

Environment

4121 readers
28 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solo@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And what would be the gain for the UK Parliament to use fearmongering tactics for something like that?

[–] Geodad@beehaw.org 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Probably the same thing that has American congress doing it. Ties to fossil fuel companies.

[–] solo@fedia.io 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt it's what you say.

All countries have ties to fossil fuel. There is even a shared history of oil and nuclear energy

Apart from that, currently Britain prepares to go all-in on nuclear power — after years of dither and Keir Starmer expected to confirm result of 15-year search for investment at UK-France summit next month. For me, this would be a reason not to spread fearmongering on this matter.

So, any other reason you can think of to back your argument?

[–] Geodad@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Thr socialistworker.co.uk has a clear anti nuclear bias.

It was easy to find multiple articles with them bashing nuclear from a simplr Leta search.

I hope the UK government does go hard on nuclear. It's a good supplement to renewable energy. With the rigjt reactor type, it too could be renewable energy.