this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
445 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

71998 readers
3230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Come for the video of a Tesla Robotaxi driving double the speed limit and hitting speed bumps like they are Mario Kart ramps...

... But stay for the conversation about social media silos and corporate disinformation campaigns!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 11 points 5 days ago (14 children)

Not surprising to anyone that ever driven a Tesla, or other brand car really. The speed sign detection only works about 90% of the time, which is fine if you are in control, but for self driving? Had the same with BMW, Mercedes, Renault, Honda. None of the cars I've driven over the past years were close to 100% correct with reading signage.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I've noticed that, too.

The speed signage is nice when the car picks it up, but I'd call mine 80% accurate. Imperfect, but fine for a driver assist, I know not to rely on it.

Crazy move to put it in a 99.9999%-accuracy-required design.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Google maps knows the speed limit of most roads, why can't that be used?

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Because the "Google thought so" approach is legally problematic.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Ah, that makes sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)