Emacs

2670 readers

2 users here now

Our infinitely powerful editor.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Berserkware@lemmy.ml

Zippoh@lemmy.ml

The case against which-key: a polemic (www.matem.unam.mx)

submitted 3 months ago by oantolin@discuss.online to c/emacs@lemmy.ml

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I explain what I dislike about which-key and what I think people should use instead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] monnier@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

[ The problem I have which which-key is that it applies only after a prefix. ]
Mutating a keymap with setc[ad]r is evil! Since you bind that map to a prefix, why not use (menu-item "dummy" KEYMAP :filter FUNCTION) instead?
[ The problem with this trick is that it can be used only after a prefix. 🙃 ]

[–] oantolin@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

The problem I have which which-key is that it applies only after a prefix.

There are commands which-key-show-major-mode and which-key-show-top-level, which you could use. On the embark side, there is embark-bindings which by default gives you bindings from the major mode and minor modes, but with C-u will give you global bindings.

Mutating a keymap with setc[ad]r is evil!

Agreed.

why not use (menu-item "dummy" KEYMAP :filter FUNCTION) instead?

Only because I didn't think of it!