this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
898 points (96.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

25512 readers
2305 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

Just my perspective as a controls (SCADA engineer):

I work for a large power company. We have close to 100 sites, each with hundreds of IP devices, and have never had a problem with ipv4. Especially when im out in the field I love being able to check IPs, calculate gateways, etc at a glance. Ipv6 is just completely freaking unreadable.

I see the value of outward-facing ipv6 devices (i.e. devices on the internet), considering we are out of ipv4s. But I don't see why we have to convert private networks to ipv6. Put more bluntly: at least industry, it just isn't gonna happen for decades (if it ever does). Unless you need more IPs it's just worse to work with. And there's a huge amount of inertia- got one singular device that doesn't talk ipv6 at a given generation site? What are you supposed to do?

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)

90% of industrial devices are still 100 Mbit/s.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean that's of the ethenet capable ones... a huge chunk are still serial

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 12 points 5 days ago

I was going to say, my friend has to maintain some fucking DOS systems because their ancient embroidery machines only want to talk to software as old as they are, over connections as old as they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)