I dont really agree with counting the oceans but not counting the gaseous areas of the gas giants, but i guess it getd messy with how to portray it. Portray it as a liquid form of the gases so you have definite volume? Remove the liquids from the equation (but that would create MORE land on earth)? I dont know. It just seems like removing them from the equation creats an extremely small picture, but maybe that's the point.

[–] retrolasered@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is land beneath the ocean. Is there land beneath the gas?

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, but there might be a theorized metallic liquid hydrogen

[–] sexybenfranklin@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 day ago

So, not solid surfaces, as called out in the image