this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
841 points (99.3% liked)

me_irl

6851 readers
388 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 129 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You. The dust is coming from you.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That is to say, a significant portion of dust is actually skin cells shed by humans.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And pets et. al.

Love our pets to death but four of them is going to generate some stuff

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I have two and generate the equivalent of several new pets every week.

[–] ganymede@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

used to be. i think synthetic fibers have changed that alot

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Microplastic in other words.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

not necessarily. if you live on a delta or a river bank the soil is very fine. particularly in dry seasons, it travels far (more than sand) through air and comes through opening of a house. fine particles stay suspended in air for long. so even if you close the windows you will see dust depositing on surface, especially electrically charged ones.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I live near a volcano, and I'd say most of the "dust" in our home is actually very fine volcanic ash.

There's definitely some skin cells and pet dander in there. There's just no way that those things are a majority of what we sweep up every few days, because our collective mass cannot possibly be dwindling that quickly.

A quick search suggests that one square inch of skin has 19 million skin cells. At a rate of 1000 per hour, it would take 19,000 hours (791.6 days) for one person to shed enough cells to equal one square inch of skin. Two humans live in my household, so we'll say for us together it would take roughly a year.

I'm sweeping up multiple cubic inches of dust multiple times a week. If dust were "mostly" skin cells, we should only need to dust a little bit once a year.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm going to wrap myself in saran wrap

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Same, but that's just my kink.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What you meant to say is “the dust is coming from inside the house!”

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

I promise you most of the dust in my house is from me.

Because I work construction, and I often forget to dust off before entering.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you read your own linked article?

From the article you've linked:

And since an individual with the average amount of skin surface area sheds 1,000 skin cells per hour, that means a lot of the dust in your home, and many other places, truly contains a lot of dead skin.

“[T]he debunkers are debunked,” Muller says in the video, adding that “dead skin cells do make up a significant portion of household dust.”
[...]
Are you shocked to learn that this “myth” is, essentially, true?

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A significant portion, yes, but not the majority of it. The majority of it comes from fabrics, or depending where you live and the air system you have, outside.

If you watch the full video that point is made clear.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Alright. I have only read the article. Might watch the video sometime later.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I fucking wish. Dust in the middle East is mostly sand particles

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sand is mostly shed human skin.

[–] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We here on Lemmy struggle with understanding sarcasm sometimes.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

That's what the sarcasm flag is there for: "/s"
which you put at the end of the specific sarcastic expression.

Some people just have trouble understanding sarcasm. Be it, because the intended tone is not understood by the reader due to the mere text medium, or because someone has trouble understanding irony and sarcasm due to being neurodivergent.

For irony and jokes I use "/i" and "/j" respectively in a similar manner.

In the context here, I would have just written:
"Sand is mostly shed human skin. /j"

TBF, we’ve probably all met a lot of genuinely stupid people. Poe’s Law can strike anywhere, anytime.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

More specifically foreskin

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Or possibly the dry Arizona desert you live adjacent to. That may contribute.