this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
70 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10495 readers
754 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can anyone explain how a cop there regularly is better than a speed camera?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Can anyone explain how a cop there regularly is better than a speed camera?

Which is more likely to have a stronger and more immediate deterrent effect on speeding: getting stopped in the act and getting a ticket (plus points on your license) immediately, or getting a ticket in the mail a couple of weeks (after you may have even forgotten being in that area) later and no impact on your licence?

In my city there was a photo radar set up at a construction site that issued 10 tickets to the same vehicle over a period of 2 weeks all before the driver recieved the first ticket in the mail. How does that improve road safety (assuming that actually the intent of photo radar)?

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair - I agree it should be a faster fine to ticketing timeframe. Personally, I think they should do the one month "warning" tickets mailed out to everyone who speeds, when they first install the camera, followed by fines. Give drivers a chance to change their behaviour before being hit by fines.

But a cop isn't pulling over every single driver doing 50 in a 40 zone. A ticket camera is hitting all of them. I'd argue that's far more fair.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But a cop isn't pulling over every single driver doing 50 in a 40 zone.

No, but having one pulled over does a really good job of slowing everyone else down and making them aware that there is active enforcement happening right now.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

How is a camera not the same as active enforcement right now? There is a sign warning of the cameras use, a sign stating the limit, and the camera is usually visibile on the side of the roadway. If you are a responsible driver you should be looking for and reading the road signs and you would know there is an active camera enforcing speed limits.

Most people would pass that cop and go "whew lucky that wasn't me" then speed on the same stretch the next day because it unlikely they'll do radar in the same spot twice in a row.

load more comments (6 replies)