this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
1018 points (99.4% liked)
People Twitter
8449 readers
1309 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The point of these programs is to eliminate 'doubt', the agent KNOWS that the machine is saying that the target should be detained and that's all they need for an excuse to effect an arrest.
The fact that their knowledge is based on flawed technology isn't something that you can argue in the field, only in front of a judge which is well after you've been arrested.
This technology is used like drug sniffing dogs are used now. They provide an excuse, probable cause, and the fact that it's completely possible to arbitrarily generate probable cause isn't something that helps you during your encounter.
It's a shit tactic but, absent legislation from a working government, law enforcement can get away with shady and unconstitutional tactics. Since we don't have a functioning federal government we have to deal with these shady tactics from law enforcement and hope that courts will eventually find the truth.