this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
161 points (93.0% liked)

World News

33571 readers
352 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tech company faces negligence lawsuit after Philip Paxson died from driving off a North Carolina bridge destroyed years ago

Discuss!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Doesn’t sound like google’s fault, does it?

The article even mentions that other entities are sued but oh that sweet headline.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

The bridge was broken years though, so Google should not have been using it for routes. The country is definitely at fault for not having signs up, but Google isn’t blameless in this.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The company literally directed this man to his death. Why are all these commenters going to bat for a trillion dollar company that refused to pay a programmer for the ten seconds it would take to fix thee issue?

[–] splinterspine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is simply not the responsibility of google to prevent this tragedy. It is firstly the responsibility of every driver to make sure to be able to see where you are driving and be able to stop in time in case of unexpected. What if there was a person in his path and he could not stop in time for example?

And secondly it is the responsibility of the local authority/agency to put up signage and block the road.

Sure, i am not a fan of giant megacorps either, and it makes sense to be angry at google for not correcting the wrong map data. But strictly from a responsibility perspective, i don't think google should be held accountable here.

I also believe the thinking "directed this man to death" is too extreme. It simply is a map, with route information. There is no automatic driving or compulsion to follow its direction, the driver has to make safe decisions by himself imo.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What if there was a person in his path and he could not stop in time for example?

Then that would be on him, because google did not receive multiple reports of a person in the middle of the road for ten goddamn years, and it's easier to spot a person in the middle of the road than it is to spot this

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)