this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

9572 readers
1735 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago

260W TDP according to Geizhals ... that's two 8-Pins, or one USB-C. And both wouldn't burn down your house...

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait for this card to get released!

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait for this card to be easily found in shelves for a decent price!

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Even if they were a bit more expensive, just having stock would put them in a better position than Nvidia.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

with frame generation.

So not hitting that

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's not that great imo.

In terms of pure numbers, it's significantly worse than the 7900 XT, which had 5376 shader cores, a 320 bit bus width, 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and a bandwidth of 800 GB/s. Only the boost clock was worse, at 2.4 GHz.

Let's hope the additional clock and new architecture offsets this to match/beat the 7900 XT.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're not making a flagship card like the 7900/(xtx) this go around. They're targeting midrange

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm aware, but right now I could purchase a 7900 XT for a bit less than 699€, including 19% VAT - meaning the price before tax is closer to 566€.

Right now there are some leaks suggesting the RX 9070 XT will be sold for $499 - or 476€. After adding 19% VAT it would be 566€ - or 130€ cheaper than the average 7900 XT:

If the card also performs worse than the 7900 XT, I don't think it has great value.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Compute power seems to be the same, disregarding any architecture changes. If they manage to pull off equal performance at a lower price and lower power envelope, it'll actually be quite something.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hopefully, because something like 10% lower performance at 20% lower price is nothing to be excited about imo.

It'd make a good card if it matched the 7900 XT and a great one if it beat it.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's because you already have top notch gear:) For everyone that's not already at 7900 level performance 90% of the performance at 80% of the price is great.

For those that are able to spend 80% of the price, that is.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wish I had top notch gear :(

I just don't think a price-to-performance improvement of 12.5% for a new generation is good. It's OK, sure, but nothing to write home about.

It'd be good at $449 and great at $399 but I haven't seen any leak suggesting these prices.

I just don't want this card to be an incremental improvement over the 7800 XT instead of a substantial one.

Edit: Wouldn't this make the 9070 XT pretty much identical to the 7900 GRE both in price and in performance? From what I can tell, the 7900 GRE is the best price-to-performance upper midrange card AMD has.

[–] ravshaul@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 week ago

The value will be a comparsion of path tracing and raying performance on ultra, no FSR and no DLSS, at 1440p ultra of 9070 XT and 5070 Ti.

To get gamers interested in Radeon, if ray tracing performance matches or slightly higher than 5070 Ti, than it must be priced at $500 to beat 5070 at $550 or gamers will buy nVidia.