this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
724 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
3152 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI Summary:

Overview:

  • Mozilla is updating its new Terms of Use for Firefox due to criticism over unclear language about user data.
  • Original terms seemed to give Mozilla broad ownership of user data, causing concern.
  • Updated terms emphasize limited scope of data interaction, stating Mozilla only needs rights necessary to operate Firefox.
  • Mozilla acknowledges confusion and aims to clarify their intent to make Firefox work without owning user content.
  • Company explains they don't make blanket claims of "never selling data" due to evolving legal definitions and obligations.
  • Mozilla collects and shares some data with partners to keep Firefox commercially viable, but ensures data is anonymized or shared in aggregate.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 16 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Mozilla collects and shares some data with partners to keep Firefox commercially viable

How hard is it to be specific? People are concerned about this, can they not tell us the exact data they share and with whom, or is doing so going to make people more concerned so they are avoiding telling us?

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

They can’t be specific in the legal note because that would close their options and prevent them from auctioning off every month to the new highest bidder.

They certainly could keep a page of what they’re currently selling to whom, but even if it was innocuous (doubtful) that would again put them in the news every time they changed it.

Tried and true ~~legal~~ PR strategy: say nothing and hope the attention goes away

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Anyone have a decent Android alternative? Updated my phone last night and this morning got a notification that Firefox had full permissions for accessing my location data. I'd like to move away from Firefox before enshitification is in full swing.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago

I switched to waterfox. Looks pretty much the same, no issues so far.

[–] MacStache@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Try out Ironfox. It can be installed through F-Droid.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Dope, I'll give it a go 👍

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

they were effectively owning everything you fo in firefox, how is that nothing

[–] steelrat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Already uninstalled everywhere. Better luck next time, Mozilla.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

this is them rolling it back cause of the outcry, they don't want to admit it worked

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The terms were never actually bad. This is them responding to the backlash, yes, but that's just because everyone freaked out over nothing. They're not "rolling back" anything, and this comment is just more disinformation.

[–] Brumefey@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

The proof that even techies can confuse « rollback » and « fix ».

[–] LittleRatInALittleHat@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

A FOSS browser has and never will require collecting user data.

This should not happen at all.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What do you think a browser does?

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 3 points 1 hour ago

The browser manufacturer doesn't need a license to my inputs to process them and give them to the server it's supposed to give them to. If you type a text in Libre office, does it ask you for a license to the text in order to save it?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 41 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Certain features certainly could be considered as doing that, such as:

  • Firefox sync
  • crash reporting
  • add-on store

I certainly want those. And then there are others that I don't want:

  • Pocket
  • telemetry
  • studies
  • AI

My understanding is that this change is primarily motivated by a recent law change in California that has a pretty broad definition of "selling user data" and this is less likely to be a fundamental change in how Mozilla operates. However, let's see what they come back with.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

That second list should also include

  • Ads

Because ads in the search bar results are one of the things Mozilla cited as precipitating the need for ToS.

[–] based_raven@lemm.ee 7 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

What's the alternative for Android? Fuck Chrome I want to move off this shit onto something that actually gives half a shit about me.

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 12 hours ago

Boy have i got a treat for you, Ironfox! the continuation of Mull

https://gitlab.com/ironfox-oss/IronFox

[–] limoncia@lemm.ee 14 points 14 hours ago

Fennec on F-Droid, which is Firefox fork

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 4 points 14 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 42 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

Too late, I switched to Floorp.

Because of privacy stuff? No. Because of repeated drama? Yes.

I don't have time for this stuff. I don't have time to track every minute twist of the knife that Google's funding drives Mozilla to embark on.

I'm bored of using software and watching it go through "death by a thousand minor dramas"

So now I use a web browser that has a name so stupid I don't even recommend it to other people. Brilliant.

[–] gunpachi@lemmings.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Try zen browser. It's just like floorp but has that Arc browser aesthetic.

I was a floorp user until I tried zen browser. You should give it a try too.

[–] JayGray91@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago

Never heard of this one before. too bad it doesn't have a mobile version as well.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The drama isn't exactly their fault. There are a lot of rich organizations that want them to cease to exist. Most 9f which want track you online and/or shove ads down your throat.

[–] dnzm@feddit.nl 13 points 14 hours ago

A fair amount of drama is exactly their fault. Mozilla chose to increase management pay and fire people, Mozilla chose to flirt with ai, Mozilla bought an ad firm, and so on. It's not like someone was holding a knife to their throat.

Truly an outstanding move

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 20 hours ago

Floorp isn't recommended for its privacy features anyway, it's recommended by users for the amount of customization you can do. It's got some features that Firefox has that I don't want to do without.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zecg@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't sell your shit, I collected it and shared it to keep myself comercially viable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 184 points 1 day ago (21 children)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›