this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

Games

35556 readers
937 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolstoy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

IMO we really should try to look at these games as "new ones" and not put them into a Schublade (pigeonhole). Please correct my phrasing if I'm wrong.

It's its own style, gameplay and story. Sure we can make comparisons but we shouldn't expect them to be like the games we compare them with. As an example, Avowed was compared to Skyrim and people immediately jumped the train and accused it of being too linear, not big enough and not having much choices. Undeserved because it's nothing like Skyrim, at least for me.

I hope Rebellion didn't chase any trend and had its own ideas but we will see. And btw: never, NEVER preorder!

[–] Aequitas38472@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Usually I’m all about games like this but for whatever reason it just looks uninspired. Maybe it’s all a little too goofy and bright and clean.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

I watched the video they released the other day and stopped half way through. It looked rather dull and also ugly, unfortunately.

How is there no middleware available for NPC movement? It looked tremendously stilted. Similarly the lighting and environments looked worse than things I was playing fifteen years ago. I don't need cutting edge but it looks distractingly ugly to me.

[–] Konraddo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well said. It looks too clean/polished.

[–] tatann@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Outer Worlds had the same issue, the Borderlands "humour" and bright colors didn't mix with the "Fallout in space" overall theme

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

IDK, reading this really solidified the idea that it actually is just Fallout: Britain. Gameplay is incredibly similar, and there appear to be a lot of instances of "Fallout has X, so this game has X too." Kinda like "I will copy your homework but change it a bit so its not too suspicious."

Also, a spelling mistake in literally the first sentence is not a good look for whoever the Editor is.

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree, but my problem is the ways in which it clearly isn't Fallout. Specifically, FO has some deep lore that justifies the existence, mannerisms and internecine postures of the various factions, but here it's apparently just... Waves of nutters take the first opportunity to move into a radiological quarantine zone and set up shop as conveniently thematic gangs for... reasons.

"Just think about it lads! Not only can we live in a place that'll kill us on the cellular level, but we can wear theatrical facepaint - don't ask where we're getting a steady supply of that - like a 24/7 Kiss revival concert! It'll be awesome! There'll be matching top hats for everyone. Millinery is a real growth industry in here. Mind the mercury."

But other than that, it looks fun enough.

Edit: Spelling.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Not only can we live in a place that'll kill us on the cellular level, but we can wear theatrical facepaint

This no longer seems like a stretch.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Uninspiring name though