this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1214 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
3817 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Good, fuck "AI" fuck copyright, fuck patents, fuck proprietary closed-source software, fuck capitalism, fuck billionaires, and fuck you, Sam, in particular.

[–] Glent@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Guarantee their plan is to blow through copyright laws to create a monopoly fiefdom, close the door behind them and demand that copyright is used to protect the work their LLM creates.

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Sad to see you leave (not really, tho'), love to watch you go!

Edit: I bet if any AI developing company would stop acting and being so damned shady and would just ASK FOR PERMISSION, they'd receive a huge amount of data from all over. There are a lot of people who would like to see AGI become a real thing, but not if it's being developed by greedy and unscrupulous shitheads. As it stands now, I think the only ones who are actually doing it for the R&D and not as eye-candy to glitz away people's money for aesthetically believable nonsense are a handful of start-up-likes with (not in a condescending way) kids who've yet to have their dreams and idealism trampled.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

In Spain we trained an AI using a mix of public resources available for AI training and public resources (legislation, congress sessions, etc). And the AI turned out quite good. Obviously not top of the line, but very good overall.

It was a public project not a private company.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Alright, I confess! Almost all of my training in computer programming came from copyrighted material. Put the cuffs on me!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

National security my ass. More like his time span to show more dumb "achievements" while getting richer depends on it and nothing else

[–] Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Sorry to say, but he's right. For AI to truly flourish in the West, it needs access to all previously human made information and media.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Fair use doesn't mean shit if you're a pirate.

Arr, matey.

[–] sirber@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

AI always been about using stolen stuff

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

Oh no! How could we ever live without AI?

[–] Enelop@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

He means development of AI in public view is over. Governments will continue without regard for copyright protections until we are all dead.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

He's right tho. China don't care. You think the west will be able to outcompete China with such limitations?

And the end result is the same, no one was compensated and a dictatorship is running one of the most important new IT tools.

load more comments