this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
1101 points (98.8% liked)

World News

45286 readers
3662 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I know my state would find a way to ban this shit. They hate anything that prevents needless suffering.

[–] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago
[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

The EU will welcome your scientists and Pharma companies with open arms.

[–] DegenerationIP@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They researching for quite a while now. I really hope this will get to the market. Another bonus is, that it theoretically doesn't need to be rushed.

But the antivaccines movement will totally Lose it.

[–] haroldfinch@feddit.nl 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Also, fuck cancer. (Cancer vaccines may be next, the end of the article.)

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I see this often, but cancer isn't caused by a viral infection. Are there vaccines that exist to prevent non-viral related diseases?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Some of them can be. HPV is the typical cause of cervical cancer, which is the one I can think of off the top of my head.

[–] bananabenana@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Not true at all. Viruses do induce cancer, likely much more than we realise. HPV is the clearest example, but also EBV and Hep B https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-019-0558-9

There are also several cancer vaccines showing success in stage 3 trials: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41591-023-00072-0

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So we'd be vaccinating those infections, not cancer itself

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Vaccines could theoretically be used to train the immune system to essentially attack cancer cells in much the same way we already use immunotherapy. Though as far as I understand it, we have yet to fully develope one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Vaccines at a simple level just train your immune system to attack certain proteins. If you could identify a protein that differentiates cancer cells from healthy cells then you could make a vaccine for cancer.

I do not have a degree in biology, take this info with a grain of salt. If a credentialed individual has better info, please speak up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WiseScorpio@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hah; I can hear RFK jr already.

[Gravely voice] "Look if you want to put that unproven poison in your body I would not recommend doing when alternatives exist, like oranges, and Vitamin D, and death."

I’d be surprised if RFK used the Oxford Comma.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Coronaviruses are not the only cause for what is considered the "common cold". I remember that some Rhinoviruses, Adenoviruses and I think a forth family of viruses also cause symptoms that are counted as a cold. It's kind of a catch all term.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Okay, sure. Then a third of all colds, which feels like a good start.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 6 days ago

Sure, I'm not opposed either! Just want to make sure people here have the information needed to not be disappointed later.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Tha's a new thing for me.

I wish they had detailed how the removal of glycans is accomplished. Alas, Wikipedia doesn't even have an article about "glycoengieering", which would likely be the term for this method.

Edit: oh, I also mistunderstood. I started thinking that it accomplishes removal of glycans from the invading virus, but instead it's only removal of glycans from the vaccine, exposing more of the virus, leading to more diverse antibodies. Which is far more doable, and not a big technical novelty. But apparently, quite useful. :)

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago

This I want.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

Wong says the team’s new vaccine could also provide protection against coronaviruses that cause influenza and the common cold.

Ugh science reporting is terrible. “This new tool could stop the cockroaches that cause bedbugs.” See how stupid that sounds?

Influenza is caused by influenza viruses.

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 14 points 6 days ago

Where can I get one?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

CSIS go take this research and get it developed for the world

That is amazing. Yay good news :')

load more comments
view more: next ›