Musk saying something doesn't reflect on the quality of the idea itself. For many thousands of years people freely imitated whatever they saw that worked, in a process known as "the spread of civilization", which turned out pretty well for humans. At some point somebody figured out they could get rich by selling copies of other people's work and paying them a pittence, aka "royalty", and boom, IP laws were born, and so was the concept that imitation = "stealing". So now you're evil if you rub two sticks together without paying somebody - unless they're evil, then you're fighting for social justice. It all makes so much sense.
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
653 points (96.8% liked)
Technology
69211 readers
5074 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Saying something and putting it into action are entirely different. If he does it, I will personally build a statue of musk.
I see someone read "Chokepoint Capitalism" 3 years later.
Hey, the broken clock's right!
IP law always had a built-in scale pronlem. Without a registration-required copyright model, and probably some sort of mandatory licensing rate system, the sheer logistics of finding and arranging rights made a lot of business models inpractical. (For example, why aren't modern bookstores just print-on-demand kiosks, or streaming services have All The Content? In large part because it would cost thousands to track down owners and negotiate terms for $1.87 in royalties multiplied by every item in the catalog.)
This was ignorable for a long time, or even a commercial advantage for firms with access to large, pre-negotiated catalogs. The AI boom created a surprise market of non-incumbents who need to get access to a lot of IP in a streamlined manner.
If we open the door for bulk IP clearance to grant the AI bubble a stro ger legal footing, it can also allow other, potentially more interesting business ideas to slip through.
Unexpected good elon take. Patents and copyright laws have probably held us back at least 50 years worth in advancements. So much R&D is just solving problems that have already been solved.
load more comments
(1 replies)
As a creative with many friends in the industry, go fuck yourselves! You can pry my IPs from my cold dead fingers.
Yeah man, pull that ladder up behind you!
In what sense is a ladder getting pulled up if IP is respected? Anyone can make a new IP, there’s not a limited supply of imagination. You can’t make everyone like what you come up with or buy it, but why should that entitle you to being able to profit off someone else’s work?
I’ve been on board with this for fucking years. Our IP system in the USA is so fucked. It’s like “death of the creator plus 40 years” or something and then Disney lobbies to increase it further to protect the mouse.
Let me make Mickey Mouse shirts and let me make money off of them!
Let me stream Nintendo games without a cease and desist!
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'm pretty much on board with getting rid of software patents as they are absolutely ridiculous, but I don't think we should necessarily get rid of the rest, but they do require reform.
The only reason musk would want this is to put his name officially on ideas he bought. Presumably on patents and whatnot.