this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
17 points (90.5% liked)

Linux

7049 readers
594 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] who@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago

These are the three that the article refers to:

  • KeePass
  • KeePassXC
  • Bitwarden (Self-Hosted)
[โ€“] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I find local password managers stronger than cloud password managers

Agreed.

I hope keepassxc is on the list. Also works like a charm on Windows ๐Ÿ˜‰

[โ€“] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

It is in the second recommendation.

[โ€“] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

I'd like to mention rook, my project, which is a secret-service-like tool backed by your Keepass DB. Not using a bespoke DB is both more secure, and more importantly, means you don't have to manually keep your passwords in sync across multiple password managers. It provides support for pin access which, when used with the Linux kernel keychain, can provide session-limited access to unlocked DBs.

Rook is in both the Arch AUR and Alpine Community repositories.

[โ€“] DmMacniel@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

Eh... Keepass and KeepassXC are great sure, but they can't top Secrets when it comes to look and feel on GNOME desktops: https://flathub.org/apps/org.gnome.World.Secrets