this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
787 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

11767 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (25 children)

I see good perspective on each end of this...

Perhaps a compromise would be a set amount per mile from home to work? For example just say like $0.65/mile.

Thoughts?

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Depends on a lot of things but yes. A compensation based on distance is good

In Debmark we get "driving deductable" (not sure about the translation)

Thats also some cents per kilometer, after a certain amount of km. If you live super close you get nothing. And you get more if you live far away too.(if you live in certain munincipalities you get more)

It also doesnt matter how you get to work. Bike, train, bus or car. Its based on distance using google maps navigation iirc (or some similar tech)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

When my job that I did covering at other locations, the company would pay me per mile to get there. It was in 2007, and they paid $0.55/mile. I think with inflation that should be much higher now.

I think that was a calculation that was just gas and wear on the car.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] kinther@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I consider my commute part of my work day. If it takes me an hour each way, I'm only in the office for 6 hours. I go home to "finish up the day" but don't really get a lot done other than light emailing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

On the one hand, as a worker, I absolutely think it should be considered part of the work day, HOWEVER, there's so many factors that go into what constitutes your commute, that I'm not sure how businesses would account for that. Is it based on distance, so the farther away you live, the more compensation you get, just because you live further away? That seems to unfairly reward people people who live farther away. Do you just give a blanket extra 1 hr (30 min before/after the work day) to everyone to account for it, assuming that that covers most cases?

It does seem to be a standard for most businesses that travel, you're paying for their time just to come out. I've had plenty of plumbers/handymen/house fixerish people who have charged just for gracing me with their presence for <10 min, even though they didn't actually do any work, there's usually a ~$50–100 minimum charge for house calls. I'm assuming their travel time is getting factored into it, so why shouldn't other workers travel time be factored in as well?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Luckily my job is quite relaxed. When I come to office - I don't work at all. I just socialize. 😅

[–] discusseded@programming.dev 13 points 2 years ago

Trust me, coworkers have opinions on this.

[–] Chatotorix@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

they want us to be back at the office because of "connections" and this sort of bullshit, so yeah, at least half of my time there will be that, then.

thankfully I only had to do this for 1 or 2 months when they forced a RTO, before I left that job and found the fully remote one that I am since then.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

When I did WFH my boss insisted that because I didn't have to commute I should have all my tools up before my shift even starts.

I didn't last very long.

This same company got sued up the ass when we were in office for trying to say we needed to have all our tools up before clocking in. But somehow WFH made it ok.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's crystal clear that commuting is not part of the work day, but perhaps it should be.

Just like we should only work 6 hours so we can actually have some time after to do things we want, like hobbies or just enjoying time with friends.

Work is consuming people's lives and entire identities.

[–] andmonad@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can anyone kindly provide a non paywall link?

[–] Argyle13@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Commute is part of the work day, but unpaid. In fact, avoiding commutes in big cities are one of the main advantages of remote work. In some cases, it is nearly, or even more, two hours back and forth an office or a plant. If people could go to the irs jobs just with a 15-20 minutes walk, it would be a very different issue, but mainly is an hour of traffice jams or packed metros and buses.

If commute should was part of the daily hours, we would see employers preoccupied because there would be people working 6 hours or less in the office or the plant, so they would ask for better transit systems and more affordable housing that implied nota having to go to live 40-50 km away because prices are unpayable nearer. Many of them would allow remote work more easily.

[–] krigo666@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In the EU it is legally part of the work day, thought not many act on it. EU Supreme Court already ruled it as so.

[–] anon_water@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

I use my drive as part of my work hours.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

If you need to do something for work that you would not otherwise do it's part of the job and should be compensated. At least that has been my attitude with any company trips or events and going to the office.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›