this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
818 points (98.0% liked)

Games

38422 readers
2173 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it's ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 82 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Since when is flying on a monster patentable. What a bunch of bullshit. Nintendo has really used up the last of any good will the company had. I will not be giving them a dime from here on out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tkohldesac@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

I wonder how much of this game they can force them to change. I know Steam has a 2 hour limit for returns but at what point does this game become “not the game I bought”?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty much anything so long as Palworld doesn't have 1.- a backbone and 2.- a dictionary at hand. Because it is as simple as finding a picture of any of a long list of animals that can glide, state the words "previous art" and they should be free from this ridiculous demand.

Mechanics that already exist in nature should not be copyrightable. Can you imagine if the first videogame company ever patented "character walking"?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 56 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck you, Nintendo. Release a fucking decent Pokemon game instead of lawyering the competition that's offering a more desirable product

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 12 points 18 hours ago

It's the capitalism way.

"The company with the best, cheapest product will come out on top.... Unless the shittier company has more money and lawyers and then they sue everyone else into the ground for even attempting to break into the market."

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago

I don't play Palworld, but still hate firms that behaves like this. Not buying Nintendo anymore 🥳 Emulators from here on :)

Patenting common stuff like this is just stupid! Think I read somewhere that Apple patented squares with rounded corners 😂 Hope Nintendo doesn't use rounded corners in any of their in-game menus.

I though patents were ment to protect important original ideas. Stuff with impact.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 31 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

Can't they just release free DLC with those features worldwide exlcuding Japan where those patents are enforceable ?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 28 points 21 hours ago (10 children)

Patents should last 10 years instead of 20, and digital patents even less.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 13 points 18 hours ago

Shit like this is why I haven't bought a Nintendo product in many years.

They might think it's keeping their profits up, but it's hurting their business, as a lot more people than me feel the exact same way.

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 10 points 17 hours ago

Make it so that you can give the glider pal skins.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›