this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
886 points (97.9% liked)

Games

38422 readers
1886 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it's ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vane@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Can't they just release free DLC with those features worldwide exlcuding Japan where those patents are enforceable ?

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be a nice "fuck you," but it's probably not worth the extra effort to them.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The spectacle of it would certainly boost sales for a little bit. How much and whether it covers the development time, who knows.

I'd do it on principle alone, but I'm a petty bitch.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It would be neat if modders put all the "patent-infringing" stuff back in.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 8 points 23 hours ago

I'm sure they will.

And as long as none of them try profiting off it, Nintendo has no leg to stand on with their usual C&D bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Patents should last 10 years instead of 20, and digital patents even less.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Digital patents should not exist. Period.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I can see why patents are so long when you need to build like a billion dollar factory to make a product and mass produce it.

Digital concepts don't take that much investment and once you have it you don't need to invest in making more, it's just there.

So yes, digital patents should be a fraction of the time that physical patents should be. Like 2 years instead of 20.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 13 points 1 day ago

Shit like this is why I haven't bought a Nintendo product in many years.

They might think it's keeping their profits up, but it's hurting their business, as a lot more people than me feel the exact same way.

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 10 points 23 hours ago

Make it so that you can give the glider pal skins.

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't a game mechanic/animation like that be equivalent to a stunt in a movie?

Like, imagine if a film director wanted to blow up a car in his movie, but was getting sued by Paramount because Michael Bay already blew up a car in Transformers.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is it that pokemon has a hold on things like animals allowing flight, but gliders allowing flight isn't under patent?

Like, whoever did gliders first needs to sue Nintendo to change breath of the wild, no gliders allowed anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nightweb@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Glide with a glider in your inventory like Zelda? Is that patented?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›