this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
1034 points (96.2% liked)

memes

14737 readers
3029 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago

Notepad++ is just, a top tier app

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

TBH, tech companies showing AI down our throats is still no good, open-source alternative existing or not.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 23 hours ago

DRM wasn't good either, tech companies are just really creative at making their products worse.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

People are allowed to want what they're comfortable with to not be riddled with llms

[–] alexaralvarado@infosec.pub 3 points 21 hours ago

On the subject of Foss and AI - one of the G summer of code projects is about integrating an AI voice platform into Neochat and I'm somewhere between bemused and amused by the lack of reaction from de KDE/Plasma community

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would be happy if more and normal people were actually mad at ai.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would be happy with more nuanced takes on AI.

Instead of just "All AI is worse than the devil and is killing babies" or "All AI is the pinnacle of humanity and is the next step in our evolution".

LLMs have a place, but it is not in every product imaginable.

[–] DrCalamity@ttrpg.network 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

When someone can produce an LLM that doesn't use more power than entire small nations to spew out bullshit, then we can start inviting nuance. Unfortunately, we have to be pragmatic here; and the consequences of lots of GenAI are way worse than returning to no GenAI.

Obviously, this doesn't include pattern recognition or protein folding AI.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

That also misses the point. If we want to pull the world out of poverty and into prosperity we're going to need an astonishing amount of power. The only key is to make power that is sustainable so that things requiring a lot of power aren't given a second thought. The thing you're mad at are massive corporations putting the cart waaaaaay before the horse. And yes, please be mad at them for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

Fingers crossed it'll end up like crypto. Here to stay in the world of finance, no longer in every product that never needed it.

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Normal people are losing themselves in AI. I’ve seen multiple instances of people using LLM to fact check someone. Endless “uhh, but I asked ChatGPT and it said blablabla” making me lose faith in humanity.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago

I don’t keep the kind of company that goes “well chatGPT says” if I’m being honest. Though I imagine that’s more of a “yet” statement.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah it's become impossible to have philosophical discussions, although this truly does seem limited to the virtual world (i.e. via text, online, etc.). If I were to go have some drinks with a friend and they busted out some LLM to take part in our discussion I would chastise them endlessly for it.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Honestly its not much different from a google search and reading some nonsense written by someone who has no authority in the subject. As long as it reinforces their belief itll be true in their eyes

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm chill with the amount of ai duckduckgo has, because its not in your face and it can be easily disabled.

[–] nerdks@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but duckduckgo has loads of adds now, too

[–] randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 23 hours ago

last I checked you can disable that? or has that changed?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sometimes you're in the feelings phase, not the solutions phase.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 177 points 2 days ago (13 children)

My dude, you can be mad at AI and use a FOSS alternative - best of both worlds

[–] WillFord27@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unpopular opinion, but it's also fine to hate having AI being added to a tried and true industry standard. FOSS is great, and I use many FOSS programs, but it's often a decade behind in features, compatibility, & stability.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago

Example I always give is GiMP. Great team, great software, but also 10 years behind photoshop. Great for hobbyists and slightly above but professionals simply can’t use it as a daily driver.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Yea, not everything is a binary choice.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is Lemmy, which is a byproduct of Reddit, and both of them have generally devolved into worlds of black and white only, although here tends to at least still have some nuance.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

It's catching, I tell you!

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, but some things are. It’s like, things are either a binary choice or they’re not. Whoa 🤯

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 67 points 2 days ago (7 children)

What people really want is to not have to change anything - neither about their lives, nor about themselves.

They want to live in a perpetual 2005 where Windows is forever usable and still just an operating system. Where they feel happy and comfortable in their environment and their skills and abilities.

And I get that, because I feel it too.

But sometimes you have to change yourself, in order to change your world.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 69 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why are the robots making art? Why are the humans packing the boxes?…

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 3 points 23 hours ago

Because hardware is more difficult to develop than software.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Exactly, we should focus on the highest paid jobs first! Automate the bankers and executives!

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 36 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Because development of mechanical devices does not hype investors nearly as much

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago

Next version of npp should reference this comic.

[–] askat@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

It's all fun and games until ai is mad at you

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Wait who doesn't already use Notepad++? It's even part of the standard install image at my job, and we have MS365 accounts already

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›