this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
975 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

70995 readers
3297 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've been saying this for years. the footprint that spaceX represents in national launch authority is out of whack to say the least.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (10 children)

The only reason SpaceX exists is because Boeing and Lockheed managed to compete so badly the only solution was to merge their launch businesses.

So we had one launch company, then spaceX made it two providers, now its back to one because B-mart is using antiquated launch systems (single use).

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 70 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

We should just fund NASA and let SpaceX and Starlink go bankrupt to competitors.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago

SpaceX has loads of capable engineers. If NASA gets a massive budget increase, they need to draw from that pool of talent.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 6 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

SpaceX and Starlink basically have no competition, and if they did, said competitor would also need to be heavily subsidized.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I think that's a complicated question. It's both yes and no. Yes, we should nationalize them. No, nationalizing them should not be by tRump. That sets the precedent, or at least reinforces, the concept that the architecture of industry can be nationalized as payback for petty political squabbling. They should be nationalized, however, because fElon has proven himself to be unstable, reckless, petty, and a risk to the nation.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

remember the halcyon days when NASA could do something and the president might not like it, but they were all FUCKING ADULTS and the grift was well distributed amongst the congresscreatures, so it never devolved into adolescent twitter whining?

goddamn those were better than whatever this shit is

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not so much because Elon is the way he is, but because the company is vital to the national interest.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

When's the last time the US nationalised something?

[–] PumpUpTheJam@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago

Racism. 1776.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The automotive manufacturers General Motors and Chrysler were partially nationalized in the wake of the 2008 Financial Crisis as were several banks... these were less a full government takeover and more of a government guided restructuring, but the government owned large stakes in these companies. Before that, the only full nationalization of anything substantial was the bankruptcy of the Penn Central Railroad and subsequent establishment of Consolidated Rail (branded as ConRail) the US's only national freight rail company.

Conrail was later privatized into what is now the private companies CSX and Norfolk Southern. The collapse of Penn Central was the largest bankruptcy in history until Enron in the 1990's. Amtrak, our national passenger rail corporation, is also a nationalized entity created around the same time as ConRail, for similar reasons, and is still nationalized (although the Trump admin wants to privatize it).

[–] zbk@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

I think during world war 2. But things were worse then 15% unemployment and people still had massive economic leverage. I don't think the US government is nationalizing anything anytime soon now. Neither party will participate in it because they are in the pockets of the oligarchs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Yeah, let's give the trump administration the power to seize companies it doesn't like, that is a great idea that def won't be abused all the time

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

Congress has always had this power. I'm personally for nationalizing telecomm companies.

[–] BugKilla@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Health; education; energy production; food production & distribution; water; housing; mass transit and telecommunications should all be classified as essential services and nationalised. Everything else can be whatever.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (20 children)

The precedent that will set and the implications... No... We should not do this.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

The precedent that will set and the implications

and what precedent is there for dealing with the executive of your country's entire space launch infrastructure when they become dependent on horse drugs?

No really, what's the precedent here, I want to know. Because if we set a precedent by ignoring it until the problem is impossible to ignore, that's gonna be a far more expensive fix.

So yeah, yeah we should consider this very strongly.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Has anyone considered funding NASA?

They made rockets that didn't explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Campliving69@aussie.zone 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Agreed. These are things that should be of the people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 41 points 23 hours ago (13 children)

I don’t think the majority of Americans understand what that means. They’ll just scream “commies!” And raise their maga flag.

But the idea of a starlink-like business owned by UN would be nice, and not an American corporation owned by a nepobaby Elmo.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›