this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
2084 points (99.2% liked)

News

30754 readers
2800 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Caesium@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (7 children)

One of my favorite hypotheticals is that once someone gets to a billion money they get a trophy that says "I won capitalism" and anything over the limit goes to folk who need it.

Knowing greed, people would certainly find ways around it, but a gal can dream

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

It's inspiring to see Americans are still fighting the good fight.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 days ago (5 children)

No wealth above a certain amount should be inherited. There is no moral justification for absurd amounts of intergenerational wealth.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] karashta@sopuli.xyz 37 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Preach!

Bring the Left back in this country finally!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Billionaire says 'I don't think we should have Zohran Mamdani '

[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Luigi has entered the chat.

Good, I agree.

He has painted a target on his own back though and he should be careful, lest he gets JFK'd or RFK'd.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

I don't think we should have the situations and lack of regulation that leads to billionaires, especially as it will likely continue to drain/erode the quality-of-life for everyone else to eventually lead to trillionaires...

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to believe that's a controversial opinion. Most people will never meet a billionaire in their lifetime, let alone become one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago (12 children)

Nobody should have a right to more than, say, 10 million dollars. Any worth over that, tax it at 100%.

Similarly for companies, tax them dynamically. Ybr bigger the company, the higher the tax. At, say, over a billion dollars, tax it 100%. Limit company sizes to 1000 employees.

This way, nobody is too big, nobody is too powerful, nobody is too rich

load more comments (12 replies)

I agree with him. there's no morally good reason to be hoarding that much money

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, we probably shouldn't have people who horde so much wealth it negatively affects the economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Had anyone ever said yet... Lin Manuel Mayoranda

I hope he goes far and makes a lot of people uncomfortable. Brave man in a moment that needs brave people.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 days ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Not a strong stance to be anti-thief. I'll take it though! We all need to speak plain sense more often.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

not surprised considering his other views but glad to see his courage in sticking to his principles against a very biased media landscape. even his rap was fun af. this guy never misses.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If a Billionaire turned comic book EVIL and decided to go rogue.... What exactly would stop him. Most countries don't have the money or desire to do anything

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

yea you're watching that now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tisktisk@piefed.social 20 points 5 days ago (7 children)

What is the other sides' argument for why we SHOULD have billionaires?
Genuinely asking if they have anything tough to contend with or is it just another critical avoidance of theirs?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›