this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
1094 points (96.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

8495 readers
3008 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Here's a concept: women over 29 years old don't view Tinder as a good option for finding decent men. Therefore only the most desperate are the ones who sign up to display themselves on the digital meat market.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's probably better than the sea of picless profiles of "discreet" married "straight" men on Grindr.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Strangely enough, I've got a couple of friends on Tinder who have noticed that their pool of people gets much better after their age rolls over "40".

Whatever it is about the Tinder algorithm automatically seeds the worst, grossest, weirdest, gnarlest dudes to anyone under that line. And then anyone over that line gets access to the pool of "normals".

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

sorry ladies, im exclusively looking for love on the Rumble forums

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

im curious now. what does it look like? what are the typical options?

it cant be as bad as a 29 year old dude on tinder, no way.

i do agree that they are intent on making that shitty app ever shittier yeah.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›