this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
426 points (97.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21567 readers
24 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

I assume this includes pedestrians and cyclist deaths? It's by population rather than by "car" or "km driven" but I'd like to see a per county breakdown.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (15 children)

America is more in the middle of the road when you look at the whole globe, and don’t just select a few counties with lower death rates.

https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/estimated-road-traffic-death-rate-(per-100-000-population)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-related_death_rate

Africa is currently the reigning champ for vehicle related deaths.

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Saudi Arabia, WTF?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Took a closer look to see if I was surprised by any correlation about poverty, and browsed away with the belief that the south is still a shithole... which might still correlate with poverty. I think kansas/oregon is the first entry that wouldn't be 'south.'

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Drinkin' beers an' drivin' yer trukk is a highly traditional pastime in the US deep south. Typically done in the middle of the night, in my experience, for the maximum probability of contacting the local wildlife or making friends at high speed with a tree.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

New Jersey is too low. Serious doubts about the validity of this table.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Jersey is best state, 100%.

[–] match@pawb.social 8 points 2 days ago

It's comparing against total population, not driving population, so any amount of mass transit will greatly reduce this number

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 days ago

Probably not. The state has been implementing Vision Zero as a statewide program along with several cities.

The two major highways have lower than average accidents due to design.

One of the state's signature traffic configurations, the Jersey Jughandle, eliminates left turn movements on older highways, a major source of accidents.

[–] dastechniker@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

SOUTH CAROLINA #2!!!! 🥳🥳🎉🎊🎉🎉🎊🍻🥳🎉🎉🪅

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where are Idaho, Wyoming and Montana?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There are only 36 states represented here by my count. It says "major" states, whatever that means. But 14 in total are missing either because of their smaller populations, or because their fatality rate is low enough that they would fall off the right hand side of the chart and thus wouldn't fit the "America Drivers Bad" narrative quietly being implied, here.

Edit: I looked up the numbers for my state in the same year (and no, I'm not telling the public which one). We would be at 1.2 on this chart if my math is correct, which is well below even the shortest bar for Victoria, there.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I decided to look and found that this metric is almost always measured by vehicle distance travelled rather than by population. Basically the graph OP shared is useless and meant to support a narrative, as you stated.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I'd like to see the % of trucks vs cars for each location.

[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The south is killing it!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›