this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
736 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

73939 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Guy who runs waning AI service (Copilot, currently being eaten by Claude Code and Qwen Coder) says use his AI service or you’ll be out of a job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Guess I'm migrating my code to a different service then 🤷‍♂️

[–] alvyn@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 week ago

Is his message: “let us scrape your code or go away, and we gonna scrape it anyway” note: scrape = steal

[–] aliser@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

does "embracing AI" means replacing all these execs with it? or is it "too far"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] falcunculus@jlai.lu 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is [...] a strange marketing strategy by AI companies. Instead of selling products based on helpful features and letting users decide, executives often deploy scare tactics that essentially warn people they will become obsolete if they don't get on the AI bandwagon.

Very insightful for me to read this. If AI in its present state was as useful as it is advertised, it wouldn't need such apocalyptic language.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] art@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Risky talking down to developers. Does the CEO not know that Git is like REALLY easy to move?!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

I got out when Microsoft bought it, glad I did. I don't want you training your shitty AI on my shitty code.

TIL Github has a CEO.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I like Codeberg better anyways.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

such an easy choice ......

(edit: I followed up and got out. This too is now self-hosted and codeberg when needed)

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago

Message to Github CEO: your job is one thing AI is best at.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Microsoft mouthpiece parrots Microsoft talking point. News at eight.

[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Two words: good fucking luck!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] warm@kbin.earth 21 points 1 week ago

what a piece of shit. par for the course for a ceo though.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 1 week ago

I asked an AI to generate me some code yesterday. A simple interface to a REST API with about 6 endpoints.

And the code it made almost worked. A few fixes here and there to methods it pulled out of it's arse, but were close enough to real ones to be an easy fix.

But the REST API it made code for wasn't the one I gave it. Bore no resemblance to it in fact.

People need to realise that MS isn't forcing it's devs to write all code with AI because they want better code. It's because they desperately need training data so they can sell their slop generators to gullible CEOs.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hate to say it, but this is going to be so much worse than cloud everything when it all comes crashing down.

Because people won't have AI to help them do anything. For some reason I get that's kind of the idea.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Does github copilot include attributions and licenses from projects it copy paste code from or it's just stealing and pretending like nothing happened like all other AI ?

[–] Juice@midwest.social 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can always count on the ceos of smaller companies that are owned by larger mega corporations to tell it to ya straight with no bias

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iglou@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago

Oh I'm already out, but only of your shitty products.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Curious when the last time business insider quoted a labor leader without a CEO or capitalist shill quoted in the same article. A US private equity group Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) acquired a majority share in the parent corp in 2020. They're also selling ads for development in the west bank under yad2 https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/germany-media-giant-axel-springer-advertises-israels-illegal-settlements-in-the-west-bank-through-its-classified-ads-website-yad2-incl-co-comment/

[–] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

GitHub is the worst git platform out there, I want version control not fucking Facebook for programming

Anyway,another point for "I'm just gonna make some money in this field nd fuck right off doing something actually useful "

CEO = Marketing with a different title. Trust the words out of their mouths the same.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I see Microsoft don't need developers and those who work there are morons. That's how I read what Github CEO said.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 15 points 1 week ago

Well, given git is decentralized and self-hostable.....

[–] the_doktor@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Dear all governments:

Ban AI. Completely.

Love,

Intelligent people

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 14 points 1 week ago

I have a lot of projects, many OSS and some private. I self host forgejo for my private stuff and also have a lot of my oss there.

Still, I currently use GitHub as my main git service, since it's the most polished code forge and their ci servers are free and fast as fuck. The only other thing keeping me there is the network effect in the sense that I like my projects to be more discoverable, not that anyone gives a shit about my code besides a few friends and randos.

If they get annoying, it's trivial to move. I got the infrastructure set up, and forgejo federation is coming.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I really don't understand CEO's obsession with AI... is it because when they give LLMs a go they feel smart and finally capable of doing the things others could do but they were too dumb to engage with, like reasonably good writing or drawing pictures?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Way ahead of you, looked for GitHub alternatives such as codeberg ages ago.

[–] _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

I've always hated GitHub glad to see it finally is going to crumble

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›