this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
283 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

73792 readers
3357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Should I Buy One?

That's up to you, champ. I'm not your real dad and I'm not trying to take his place. But I'm here for you if you need me.

Love it. 🤣🤣🤣

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

dude this thing has a flashlight? you son of a bitch, I'm in

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

No, he said torch. I assume butane.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

On a side note I wish hybrid smartwatches were still a thing. Most of the product lines are discontinued, but I liked the idea of it.

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I really really like my Garmin Instinct 2. It a kind of hybrid but between old digital clock and smartwatch, instead of analog.
It has strong Casio Pro Trek vibes. One color, no touch LCD screen. Solar charging, more than 3 weeks battery life, GPS, all health sensors and smart stuff.

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

I had a garmin vivomove hr. The idea behind it was pretty neat, but it was too annoying to keep charged.

Garmin makes excellent watches

[–] jodanlime@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like withings cornered the market on hybrids. They are a little pricey but they are built very well.

[–] Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yea they're pretty much the only brand still.

I liked my garmin vivomove, it was pretty nice despite some clunkiness (the one I bought was early on)

I'd like to try one, but I feel like I might end up not using it often or just not liking it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 14 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Get a BangleJS2 and you won't need to charge it on a bus.

2 weeks between charges. GadgetBridge is the mobile app. It's more expensive, true: £76. The battery is replaceable, though, so you might have to buy fewer.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Loved the article.

One pet peeve of mine: PD plugs are too powerful to charge puny devices. Not the first time I've run into this problem.

So sad that we've finally gotten a good standard (USB c) but there are still things that look like they should fit together and work, but don't.

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The thing is that USB type C is only about the physical plug/socket, and the USB standard and version that uses it is a separate thing.
In this case it's probably a PD only charger and the device only supports plain old 5v 500mA USB power

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

too powerful? what do you mean? USB PD by default supplies 5v the same as USB A and increments from there

5v is pretty low - 3v is pretty common logic voltage, but i doubt anyone would use voltage that low for battery charging?

do you mean you don’t like to “waste” a perfectly good powerful USB C port? you can get some pretty low watt USB C plugs, but honestly i much prefer to just have a brick with 7 big ports

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The person you replied to is referencing findings made by the author, in the article.

The author tried plugging a PD charger into the watch to charge it, and it wouldn't work. It's probably not PD as a specification couldn't work, but that the watch failed to negotiate with the charger.

Whatever the reason, the findings were that plugging your PD laptop charger into this cheap little watch does not result in any charging.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

right… i think that’s less of a problem with PD chargers and more of a problem with non-compliant A chargers (and the device itself being non-compliant): wattage/amperage at these has nothing to do with the protocol (other than auto shutoff under a given current draw, but that’s not instantaneous)

i believe that the USB spec says there needs to be a resistor bridging one of the pins to receive power? i can see USB-A chargers just dumping 5v through the cable no matter what and USB-PD more reliably implementing the spec because it’s more complex, so less reason to cut corners

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And the author wrongly said

PD will not negotiate down to 1W power levels

The correct way ro ask for 0.8 W (5 V, 0.16 A) is to request 5 volts, any current. Doesn't matter if the charger is capable of 500 mA (legacy USB), 1 A or 3.1 A. The PD standard can accomodate the watch, it's just that the watch lacks active electronics that are required to talk to the charger (and even the supplied C-C cable is non-compliant by being power-only).

Edit: apparently PD allows 0.1A steps between 0.1 A and 3 A for 5 volts so it's technically possible for a PD charger to deny power to the watch if it's VERY underpowered and can't even put out 1 W. Still, it's the watch's fault for lacking correct PD implementation.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I had no idea USB C charging was such a rarity for smart watches

[–] rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm curious about the reliability of this port on a sweaty wrist exposed to dust and general labor environments. My phones, even back to the proprietary plug days, have had the charge port covered and my wrist watch would get wrecked.

[–] edent@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It has a small rubber lug - which has worked so far at keeping out the grime. But I don't have a manual labour job.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Heh, of course it has a knock-off UI too.

Please check in with an update after 6 months.

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

No, its something different, according to the blog:

First up, the brains of the watch is the JL7012 - which is a deliberately underpowered chip.

[–] baconmonsta@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This article was right up my alley. I've been considering buying a cheapo smartwatch. I suppose this one couldn't be used as a mp3 player for jogging though.

[–] edent@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It doesn't have storage or a headphone port. But it will stream music over Bluetooth. So if you want to annoy everyone you job with, you can listen to its tinny speaker :-)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›