this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
53 points (68.5% liked)

Memes

52771 readers
134 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The world is ignorance/greed VS knowledge/cooperation.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, I think greed is definitely there in the mix somewhere.

[–] Valentian@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good, as in "service to others" and evil as in "service to self". Evil in this sense is unstable and ego drives Entropy by its nature by the same laws as cancer. Good is harder since decisions are also subject to entropy, requiring free will as the outside energy source. That's just my perspective <3

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Good and bad both exist because we want to go somewhere, or we want a certain development to happen. Therefore, the development that we want to see happen is "good" while everything that stands in its way is "bad". Yes, it is that simple, assuming you have a clear picture of where you want to go.

But not everyone wants to go to the same place, or reach the same way of living, so it's more complicated.

Oh and i forgot to mention: If the world existed in perfect balance, with nobody ever wanting to change anything, neither good nor bad would exist in the world. The world would just be.

[–] mrl1@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I am more and more learning about how personal interests often conflict with societal interests (as simple as it may sound). We are globally going to understand soon enough that democracy isn't worth shit as long as feedback loops that allow personal interests to creep in are "meta".

Loads of people have lots of ideas on how to run countries and communities, but ideology and doctrines are not really proven concepts.

And the other big problem is that to declare new forces within existing infrastructure (creating counter power to prevent positive feedback mechanisms), societal interest must still be powerful enough to not require a revolution to be enacted in a sensible and effective way.

A lot of countries have already in my mind gone way over that threshold, it's recognisable when actual societal interests, long term initiatives and big questions about the future are not asked anymore because the political power is working at consolidating their position and redistributing favours they owe to the soon to be oligarchy.

But you can't really allow anyone to be a defeatist because cynism is the last nail in the coffin, staying awake and fight hoping that enough will join soon enough is the only way to keep existing.

[–] Tracaine@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Yes. There is good, there is evil and if it requires many words to try and sway your opinion, that is manipulative - evil.

An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›