this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
482 points (97.6% liked)

Privacy

42687 readers
572 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
482
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Charger8232@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

VPN Comparison

After making a post about comparing VPN providers, I received a lot of requested feedback. I've implemented most of the ideas I received.

Providers

Notes

  • I'm human. I make mistakes. I made multiple mistakes in my last post, and there may be some here. I've tried my best.
  • Pricing is sometimes weird. For example, a 1 year plan for Private Internet Access is 37.19€ first year and then auto-renews annually at 46.73€. By the way, they misspelled "annually". AirVPN has a 3 day pricing plan. For the instances when pricing is weird, I did what I felt was best on a case-by-case basis.
  • Tor is not a VPN, but there are multiple apps that allow you to use it like a VPN. They've released an official Tor VPN app for Android, and there is a verified Flatpak called Carburetor which you can use to use Tor like a VPN on secureblue (Linux). It's not unreasonable to add this to the list.
  • Some projects use different licenses for different platforms. For example, NordVPN has an open source Linux client. However, to call NordVPN open source would be like calling a meat sandwich vegan because the bread is vegan.
  • The age of a VPN isn't a good indicator of how secure it is. There could be a trustworthy VPN that's been around for 10 years but uses insecure, outdated code, and a new VPN that's been around for 10 days but uses up-to-date, modern code.
  • Some VPNs, like Surfshark VPN, operate in multiple countries. Legality may vary.
  • All of the VPNs claim a "no log" policy, but there's some I trust more than others to actually uphold that.
  • Tor is special in the port forwarding category, because it depends on what you're using port forwarding for. In some cases, Tor doesn't need port forwarding.
  • Tor technically doesn't have a WireGuard profile, but you could (probably?) create one.

Takeaways

  • If you don't mind the speed cost, Tor is a really good option to protect your IP address.
  • If you're on a budget, NymVPN, Private Internet Access, and Surfshark VPN are generally the cheapest. If you're paying month-by-month, Mullvad VPN still can't be beat.
  • If you want VPNs that go out of their way to collect as little information as possible, IVPN, Mullvad VPN, and NymVPN don't require any personal information to use. And Tor, of course.

ODS file: https://files.catbox.moe/cly0o6.ods

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Very much appreciate this work, but I am again gonna ask if there is some way to include I2P, perhaps in its own thing, perhaps segregated by outproxies.

Yep, its super slow compared to basically all VPNs, and is a bit of struggle to set up compared to most VPNs.

But, it is also entirely free, and you can use I2P with outproxies to access the wider internet outside of I2P's... I2P-net... allows port forwarding, works very well for a slow but steady churn of uh, filesharing, etc.

I would also argue I2P is a better way that TOR to protect your IP and your actual net traffic, due to TOR nodes being known to be run as honeypots ...

Its possible an I2P outproxy could also be operated as a honeypot, but as I understand it, ... so long as you are not unlucky enough to just directly route through an outproxy without first bouncing through other I2P users/hosts... you're basically good.

And even in that scenario, its would be very difficult to reverse engineer all the packets and figure out which parts were going to who, as well as the actual contents of those packets.

load more comments (1 replies)

I'm using one of these for a long time and since I need port-forwarding there seem to be only 3 options and thanks to your data I realized I still made the right choice and gonna keep using this one for forseeable future

[–] redhilsha@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Proton is essentially the best free VPN huh.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Oberyn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Will AirVPN ever get audited ? Hope so

[–] whoopee@hispagatos.space 4 points 1 week ago

@Charger8232 as a NymVPN user I would add that I got 2 years of service paying in crypto for $50
Also this post is from Lemmy, so I retooted a Lemmy post

[–] beSyl@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It is a bit weird that AirVPN has not been audited...

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not entirely a big deal to me.

I think I agree with the staff reply on this thread: https://airvpn.org/forums/topic/56799-audits/

Our software is free and open source, while we repute at the moment not acceptable to provide external companies with root access to our servers to perform audits which can not anyway guarantee future avoidance of traffic logging or transmission to third parties. On the contrary, we deem very useful anything related to penetration tests. Such tests are frequently performed by independent researchers and bounty hunters and we also have a bounty program.

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Has anyone tried nymvpn? It's been on my radar for a bit.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Since you do not seem to list self-hosting options, e.g. WireGuard or OpenVPN, then IMHO it'd be good to at least have a line on each about what's the actual backend, e.g. does service X runs on WireGuard, OpenVPN, something else, something proprietary that has been audited by 3rd party if so whom and when.

Edit: suggested self-hosting (but not at home) WireGuard in the previous thread https://lemmy.ml/post/37270537/21536054

[–] bowreality@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks so much! I am looking for a new one because my current one is expensive and of questionable ownership haha.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is there a reason I've never seen one of these contain ExpressVPN? I used if before because it had the lowest latency of the few that I had shopped around looking at.

[–] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Seconded. Inquiring minds want to know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nice revision. If you're including TOR I would say Tailscale could be considered for a VPN. I'm hosting a Gitea instance completely for free on their service. It's on my hardware, but it's their domain.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

Been using windscribe for 2 years now. Big fan so far. Haven't had any issues and it's nice that I can set it up on my android phone to block access to everything on there if by off chance it were to crash or go down.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Proton and Mullvad VPN appear to win the battle of the charts for privacy & security.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

This is a really great resource thank you!

[–] upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago
[–] rirus@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Can someone help with torrenting over windscribe?

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe a field for number of servers currently?

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I got Mozilla VPN back when it launched. I got it at $4.99/month. I only use it for viewing and downloading "free" media online. Should I switch?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›