this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
555 points (98.3% liked)

News

32912 readers
2370 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, Trump has taught us that you can ignore the Supreme Court if your party controls Congress. So if there ever is another Democrat president with Democrat control of Congress, just revert all this and ignore whatever the SC says.

We should only be elevating Democrats who make it clear they are ready to play hardball.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We all know that he is not getting out of the white house peacefully

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Fine by me.

[–] ShamanRonin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He’s never giving up power.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, yes he is. They all do eventually, and it it's never nice.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 25 points 2 days ago

I thought I never had to hear about Kim Davis again. I never want to hear or think about that toad again. What a shame

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I am so ready to pack my shit and never come back if marriage equality falls.

Who would've thought having a partisan executive appoint a partisan judge and by approved by a partisan congress would result in a partisan Supreme Court! My vote is for using a system similar to Tennessee's State Supreme Court. A commission of judges nominate a short list of candidates -> the governor appoints from the list -> after a year, there is a popular election on whether the judge should retain their seat.
For the Supreme Court, I'd modify it to: every federal judge elects the short list with Single Transferable Voting or Approval Voting -> President appoints one -> after a year, the populous has a retention vote. Also limited and staggered terms so appointments are distributed evenly across presidencies; must pass a background check & audit; criminal & civil convictions have mandatory prison time and fines are based off percentage of wealth.

Of course neither party (and definitely not the oligarchs) are going to push for systemic changes that could curb their power, so we all need to be united with a General Strike. In the past these have lasted a few days to about a month; I expect making the constitutional changes needed to save our democracy will take longer and meet greater resistance, so Mutual Aid Networks will be crucial to support the strikers and keep essential services running. You can start by plugging in with the ones in your community, they are already everywhere.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 148 points 2 days ago (11 children)

It’s on the Project 2025 list. As such, I expect it to fall, like Roe.

Heritage is clearly funding this erasure of what We The People want.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Would they hear the case if a court clerk said she would no longer hand out marriages for anyone not religious as that is offensive to them?

Or maybe people who are left handed marrying people who are right handed? The abomination!

Where does this bullshit stop?

Government should NOT be interested in marriage. They simply should not care. The MOST they should do is have ready to made contracts if they want to manage divorce, child support, and death wealth distribution. Those are contracts. Contracts are made between consenting adults. The government either lets their citizens enter into contracts or not.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's what I'm talking about. Use their own bullshit against them. Refuse to serve/marry Christians and see how fast they say "not like that!"

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 57 points 2 days ago (40 children)

All the people that didn't vote are partly responsible for this.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Last presidential election had the highest turnout of voters and youth voters in American history.

Our problem is much more depressing and much more deeply baked-in.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Trump/ Putin/ Musk cabal rigged the election, and we ALL know it.

He won EVERY swing state? Puh-leeeze. I've got good Critical Thinking Skills, and they have been screeching in my brain ever since Election Day 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (6 children)

All the people who did vote for the cheeto are responsible as well. And I think that was the point, marriage equality was on the ballot 14 years after the supreme court ruling

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

And those who refused to vote against.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s as if these people don’t remember the riots that happened to earn equality.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The false narrative that basic rights were earned through "civil debate" has been parroted by right wing talking heads for so long.

Most people are uninformed, and have an impression that rights just kind of happened via peaceful protests or debates, either due to their own ignorance or learning a very whitewashed version of history.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 136 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They do and now they have a surveillance state to make sure the riots don’t happen again

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And a president who wants to shoot those protestors, and a federal police, answerable to no one, who can definitely do it. I'm giving it a year before we see at least one protest met with overwhelming lethal force.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

So predictable. The angry assholes hated losing that ruling, as well as losing the culture war around it. That's why they didn't really give up, but switched to harping on bathroom bills and "men in women's sports". The wedge was trans and they were going to hammer on that until they got enough Confederates in office to, yeah, attack trans, but also go after gays, even if, or even especially because of, the culture being against them for it. They hope to deport, imprison, threaten and smash down enough people to reverse that culture war, too, believe that.

They won't be happy until they turn on streaming services or their television or go to the movies and won't have to see any gays, unless it is for comic effect or the like. They definitely don't want to see anything normalized...

This might not be reversed in the near future - maybe. But the weirdoes on the right will treat this just like they did abortion. They won't give up, even if it takes them 50 years to take the rights of others away.

I just have no idea why gays voted for Taco. Or any Confederates for that matter. It just makes no sense at all. I know some gays IRL who have voted for Taco. Twice. But I guess there was actually a group called "Jews for Hitler", too, until the Nazis shut it down...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca -5 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 64 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Gosh it is almost like these MAGAts are just doing whatever the hell they want. I have a few things we can do when we get back in power.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So much for individual freedom and small government, huh.

[–] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 49 points 2 days ago

The small government is the biggest lie pushed by the right wing side of our country. In fact, when you read where the money comes from, it actually comes from a "Dark Enlightenment" coalition of techno-fascists looking to dismantle democracy.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›