this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
154 points (93.8% liked)

World News

33451 readers
704 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] catsup@lemmy.one 15 points 2 years ago

Outrageous. I would actually be protesting if this were to happen in my country, and you wouldn't hear the end of it. Protect-the-children my ass, this is an attack on the freedom of the common folk. Criminals will continue to use encryption even if its against the law; they were already commiting crimes, so what's one more in the list?

[–] Shjosan@sockermunk.se 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This bill seems to be all sort of bad (maybe with some good intentions), really hope it doesn't pass to not give other countries any ideas

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.de 22 points 2 years ago

Please don't fall in that trap. Authoritarian attacks on citizens have always been neatly wrapped in either anti-terrorism or protect-the-children propaganda since the dawn of politics. This is a very obvious and delibirate attempt to further remove freedom from the common folk.

[–] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s not really that hard to deploy a matrix server. So this bill is dumb as anyone who wants encrypted messages can easily have them.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm all for Matrix, but the things is, Matrix is primarily developed by people in the UK. They will be easily forced to implement backdoors.

[–] worfamerryman@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s good to know🙏

Hopefully some trustworthy third party can audit the code if this ever becomes a thing.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure auditing would be enough. We would literally need a development team outside of dictatoric countries like the UK, where such things can be forced.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

UK is such a shithole.

[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would VPN protect an individual against such actions?

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

VPN will encrypt your communications between your local PC/phone/device and the VPN server you connect to. After that, the data packet transits just as if you’re anywhere else. So if they can crack that encryption, your data is still open. They might not know where the packet came from, but if you are talking PII, that’s not really important. (Does it really matter what IP you had when you tell them your health history and name? Or full banking info?)

[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I really don't like that.

Even if it will get dismissed/amended so it doesn't ruin open and private internet, the direction it's all going really worries me. Every couple of months/years you will hear that the governments are trying again and again...Eventually they will succeed - enter "1984"

[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

The governments don't even need to go that far, they just get the data directly from the corporations people just willingly divulge it to.

[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What about decentralised solutions like Matrix? I think they would have hard time accessing anything if it's stored on a private server. EDIT: Or is it on ISP level? So no matter how you access/communicate - it will all be scanned the point when data leaves your device and communicates with web.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 1 points 2 years ago

Why would they get a VPN to exit from the UK tho lol