this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

News

30946 readers
2477 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes that's shit.

But also on top of that 25 really means maybe 15, because they also don't require them to provide the bandwidth they advertise to you.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Yes. We need the numbers to be minimum bitrates and we need at least a 90% uptime for that minimum. If you could rely on your bandwidth to be a specific rate all the time you could pay for less and everyone could get more without more infrastructure upgrades.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't call this speed okay even in 2012

[–] Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They’ve been stealing taxpayer dollars for 30 years, constantly stalling and delaying and then saying the plans are now outdated and we need more money for the new plans. Repeat every decade. Everyone knows it’s a monopoly with speed/price fixing yet somehow it never improves.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can't speak to Comcast's evils, but I call my ISP once a year to ask about my speeds and bill. Just got bumped from 200/20 to 1000/?, with a $10 discount. I'm on the edge of town, not technically rural, but close enough.

Not sure the answer to the monopoly thing, but I used to be an internet cable guy, so I can speak to the complexity of having 2 providers where there was only one. The costs are staggering.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not sure the answer to the monopoly thing,

  • make it a publicly owned and operated municipal utility
  • make the "last mile" publicly owned infrastructure and private service providers can connect to the data center that connects the last mile
  • require that the company who owns and maintains the last mile can not also be a service provider over that last mile infrastructure

The last one is how Texas handles the power grid, so it would need a real regulatory body making sure the private last mile infrastructure is actually maintained, unlike the Texas power grid.

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

After how ajit pai shilled the fuck out of the chair position I don't know if I can ever take it seriously again.

Fuck ajit pai, of course.

[–] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

she supports net neutrality so that's nice

[–] caffinz@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You know he's not still Chairman right? That's why I said she not he?

[–] SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thats good, 25/3 speed is fine for one person, not so much for a household.

[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Absolutely not. It depends more on what you're doing, rather than number of people, anyways. One person uploading a video is going to use 99% of the available upload bandwidth.

[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

...that's the standard? wtf? 100mbps is a bit slow but would make sense, but 25???

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I love even crazy tech nerds say this shit. 100mbps is more than enough for the vast majority of families. Unless you constantly have 5 or 6 streams running concurrently you'll never use more than that outside of the occasional video game download.

[–] matthewc@lemmy.self-host.site 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Raising the standard enables new uses of technology.

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s not though. You’re taking marketing claims at face value, assuming the customer consistently sees that bandwidth with few to no glitches and low latency. You’re assuming bandwidth isn’t sucked down by ads and trackers. Doing the math in ideal numbers makes it look sufficient, but actually using it highlights that it’s not

[–] EatMyDick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I've lived on 100mbps quite easily for many years. I have gbps available and choose to save the $10. You are grossly exaggerating. Comcast and FiOS have been reliable well over 10 years now.

[–] Kinglink@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Great, now what are we going to do about it?

Hell just outlaw datacaps and I'd say that's a good step.

That being said I doubt almost anyone on here probably has more than those speeds, Cox (the worst cable company, trust me) gives me 10x those numbers, but the real problem is they'll continue to raise the rates on us, and worse, there's no competition. Verizon 5g came by and it's not really a viable alternative, because Cox just out paces them enough, but ultimately, you're going to spend at least 100 dollars a month on Cable, but still there's no choices available.