this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
466 points (84.4% liked)

memes

15985 readers
1964 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Ceteris paribus, or all things equal is a super common economics phrase. It's basically impossible to maintain in the real world. Economics used to be considered philosophy for a reason. As someone with a economics degree I do pretty much agree with you.

The "hard science" part of it is using past data to build models. You're still more or less trying to tie the figures into a theory of why they happened that may or may not be true. There are so many factors it's impossible to know. For instance I truly believe that the stronger anti-monopoly enforcement and higher taxes played a major role in America's success and the rise of the middle class from post WW2-80s. I have to admit that there are an insane amount of other factors at play here that might invalidate all the trends during the same time though. Every other developed countries info structure being bombed to the ground giving the US a huge start not being the least of which.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Only thing any of them share in common is that they link back to the Wikipedia page for Philosophy.

[–] Compactor9679@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Have to love this meme

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

This implies psychology is not a hard science.

Just because a physicist wouldn’t know how to do science in a realm as complex as psychology doesn’t mean psychologists don’t know how to.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Economy is pseudo-science. Change my mind.

[–] xptiger@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

I more believe that physics governs economies. Meanwhile, economics provides insights into how the resources are done by physics.

[–] hark@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Economics is just a tool of politics.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You’re just a tool of politics

[–] hark@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml -4 points 2 years ago

Ah yes, let me use my Lagrangian to optimize the system, because this is what psychologists do.

Now that we did that, let's take the derivative of the rectangular area of this curve to maximize it, like a psychologist would.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

Definitely. I've seen examples of economists failed attempts at math. It explained a lot about the state of the economy.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›