Europe

57 readers
57 users here now

All about Europe

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/83751

2
3
4
 
 

Why does this have to be in private ownership?!?

5
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59793780

6
7
8
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59729715

9
 
 

cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/73255

10
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/24595976

Archive: https://archive.is/2025.03.29-083158/https://www.ft.com/content/218efe0d-e4a8-4f5b-ae96-de46e64dcb89

France, Ireland and Europe’s powerful farming unions are pushing Brussels to drop many food and drink products from its proposed retaliation against US tariffs.

The European Commission has received floods of objections from business and member states to its list of measures, underlining how the 27 member block might struggle to respond collectively to US pressure.

Jack Chambers, Ireland’s public expenditure minister, warned against “retaliatory and tit-for-tat measures that could worsen a trade dispute” on Friday while Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni told the FT the EU should negotiate over its high duties on some items. 

“There are big differences on the single goods,” she said. “That’s what we have to work on to find a good, common solution.”

11
 
 

cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/73260

12
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/20131463

Archived

[Op-ed by Tauno Tõhk, Research Fellow at the International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) since October 2024, specialising in China and Chinese foreign interference. Before joining the ICDS.]

The current EU approach is structured according to the 2019 “Strategic Outlook on China,” a document providing a framework for EU-China relations.

...

However, despite persistent China-related security issues, security concerns are largely absent from the Strategic Outlook, the key document shaping EU-China relations. Since it was adopted, Europe’s security landscape has changed dramatically, particularly due to Russia’s illegal military aggression against Ukraine. China’s backing of Moscow’s war efforts directly undermines European security. However, it is important to recognise that the security challenges China poses to the EU extend beyond its support for Russia, encompassing a range of well-documented hybrid activities.

... Despite repeated claims of neutrality, China has become a “decisive enabler” of Russia’s illegal military aggression against Ukraine. It provides dual-use goods, helps to circumvent sanctions, and facilitates Russia’s hybrid operations. [...]

  • China’s role as a “circumvention hub” for EU’s sanctions against Russia, acting as both a supplier to Russia and a transit route for western products.
  • Chinese entities have been sanctioned by the EU for supplying drone and microelectronic components to Russia. Chinese officials and state-controlled media have provided a platform for Russia’s talking points and disinformation narratives.
  • China has criticised sanctions against Russia and regularly accused the west of starting and fuelling the war.

The security challenges China poses to the EU extend beyond its support for Russia

In diplomatic engagements with China, the EU and individual member states have consistently emphasised China’s support to Russia as a key irritant in EU-China relations.

...

A Threat to Security and Values

Beyond its support for Russia, China poses a challenge to European security in and of itself. This includes potential conflicts over Taiwan and the South China Sea, hybrid activities targeting EU member states, and weaponising economic and trade links for political purposes.

A conflict in the Indo-Pacific would have global ramifications. The report by Special Adviser to the President of the European Commission Sauli Niinistö calls the potential economic and security impact of Chinese aggression against Taiwan or in the South China Sea “staggering” for Europe, likely triggering opportunistic behaviour from Russia against an EU member state.

...

National threat assessments confirm China’s targeting of the EU.

  • The Swedish Security Service considers China, alongside Russia and Iran, as the greatest threat to Sweden’s security, stating that Beijing attempts to influence Stockholm’s decision-making.
  • The Danish Defence Intelligence Service notes that China is trying to sow discord between European countries to weaken the EU’s unity, for example, when mitigating risks of cooperation with China.
  • The Belgian security service similarly claims China is trying to damage intra-European relations.
  • Germany’s domestic intelligence services state that China seeks to create a favourable environment outside its borders for the Communist Party’s objectives and looks for influential political figures to speak in favour of Chinese interests.

[...]

Western cyber security agencies have attributed cyber activities targeting European governments and lawmakers critical of Beijing as well as naval research activities and technology development to China’s state-sponsored threat actors. The EU has sanctioned individuals and organisations associated with APT10, a group linked to China’s Ministry of State Security.

...

The EU should acknowledge this reality and explicitly label China a security challenge.

...

Several member states’ security services already list China among the primary security threats, especially given Beijing’s close alignment with Moscow. Officially recognising these concerns at the EU level would help forge consensus on China policy. It also shields member states from the ramifications of acting alone and facing potential Chinese retaliation in isolation, allowing them to rely on a unified stance when calling out Chinese activities that endanger European security.

...

13
14
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/9822843

15
 
 

Both have a history of EU candidacy: Norway withdrew after referenda in 1972 and 1994, while Iceland suspended accession talks in 2015 after applying in 2009. Notably, in 2024, Iceland’s governing Social Democratic Alliance pledged to hold a referendum by 2027 on resuming EU negotiations.

16
 
 

cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/63082

Written by u/Kaptajnknus on Reddit

Pituffik Space Base has facilities for around 7000 employees, and previously the workforce consisted of 4000 civilian employees and 6000 soldiers; today there are only 150 left.

The Americans were active in 50 places in Greenland and operated, among other things, nine airports, six radar stations, a naval base and 21 weather stations.

So when American politicians talk about Denmark failing in its responsibility in relation to Greenland's security, it is part of the story that the United States has also cut back heavily on its military presence over the years.

So security in Greenland is obviously not what plays such a big role.

America is still allowed to raise its manpower if they are so worried.

They just have to remember to take their radioactive waste home with them, this time.

Having said that, Denmark has taken on the responsibility of increasing radar surveillance in Greenland in 2021, but in the meantime war has broken out in Europe, and Denmark is the 7th largest contributor to Ukraine with 0.5% of GDP, the US is number 14 with 0.4% of GDP. Despite this, Denmark has not demanded anything back from Ukraine, why would they save their resources from one dictator just to hand them over to another dictator.

17
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/20035967

The European Union is urging citizens across the continent to stockpile food, water and other essentials to last at least 72 hours as war, cyberattacks, climate change and disease increase the chances of a crisis.

18
19
 
 

Today 7 pm. Video available later on.

20
21
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/31681725

Archived

Emboldened by the Trump administration’s split with Europe, Russian President Vladimir Putin may be preparing to directly test the resolve of the postwar Western military alliance.

In an interview with German business daily Handelsblatt, the chairman of European aerospace and defense group Airbus warned the continent needs to arm itself now that it’s likely the United States will not honor its obligations under NATO’s Article 5 common defense clause.

“There are strong indications that Russia is preparing an attack on NATO’s eastern flank,” René Obermann told the newspaper on Monday, adding that Putin will not likely wait until Europe has enough time to build up its own sovereign capabilities for deterrence before striking.

[...]

Obermann argues the Russian dictator has placed his country’s economy on a wartime footing with a fiscally unsustainable 10% of gross domestic product diverted to its military, according to Obermann. That’s five times the NATO minimum target, and Putin also plans to mobilize 1.5 million soldiers—the world’s second largest standing army after China.

With so much already invested, ending his expansionist campaign and returning to peace risks the one thing Putin appears to fear most—political upheaval. That may be one reason why a joint military exercise is planned for this year in Russia’s neighboring client state of Belarus.

“That is reminiscent of the events leading up to the Ukraine invasion. Furthermore, the internal pressure [in Russia] to deliver new victories through military conquest likely will grow,” he said.

[...]

22
23
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59411845

From the Article:

“If you think we should do it let’s go. I just hate bailing Europe out again,” Vance replied. Hegseth agreed that “I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC.” But, he added, “we are the only ones on the planet (on our side of the ledger) who can do this.”

Miller, the Trump confidant, effectively ended the conversation by saying that the president had been clear. “Green light, but we soon make clear to Egypt and Europe what we expect in return.”

24
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/24399065

Archive: none required, use reader mode if necessary

“They come highly motivated, much more so than the average recruit today,” says Valentyn about the former prisoners. There are hundreds of them, although he doesn’t reveal the exact number. In routine training, at least 50 huddle among the trees of a dense forest of bare branches on the outskirts of Kramatorsk. Some receive instructions to simulate an assault, others practice with their rifles, and others learn how to provide first aid to a wounded person.

Not every prisoner benefits from the new law. Those convicted of treason are excluded, as are drug traffickers, rapists, pedophiles, or those convicted of murder. The final say on release always rests with a judge. “There are mainly thieves and those convicted of assault,” Arey believes. Garik, a 28-year-old professional middleweight boxer, ended up in prison over a fight. He broke several bones in a man’s face, and because he was a federated athlete, the judge gave him a sentence equivalent to if he had committed assault with a knife, an aggravating circumstance that also exists in Spain. He received 13 years, but his lawyer managed to get his sentence reduced to eight. “I had been in my cell for two years, with nothing to do, when they asked me if I wanted to come. I didn’t think twice,” he says.

25
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59333147

Germany is at a crossroads when it comes to its security policy — one of the deepest upheavals of the post-War era.

view more: next ›