this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
14 points (81.8% liked)
SpaceX
2051 readers
31 users here now
A community for discussing SpaceX.
Related space communities:
- !spaceflight@sh.itjust.works
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !space@lemmy.world
Memes:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I understand these are at 60 degrees ahead of, and behind, Earth (respectively). Does anyone know how much harder it is to keep satellites at other 'offsets' from Earth? Could we realistically also have one at 30 degrees, one at 90 degrees, one at 120 degrees, and one at 150 degrees?
And could it be beneficial to send data via that route? Could they play a role analogous to something like this?:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_communications_repeater
Or would it just be a pointless increase in latency for no benefit?
Keeping a satellite at those other 'offsets' would require a continuous supply of propellant to prevent it from drifting. L4 and L5 are special in that they theoritically need no propellant for station keeping due to orbital mechanics.
As for whether it would be useful to have satellites at these other offsets, I don't see what the advantage would be. We've already tested laser communication with the Psyche spacecraft, so I don't think repeaters would be necessary. The vacuum of space doesn't attenuate the signal that much.