I'm just saying the graph is misleading because it changes the meaning of the X-axis significantly. In the screenshot it insinuates that it's data of 6 months, but 95% of the graph is the first 3 months and the last 3 months for some reason are squized into the last 5% which makes it look like it was a spike over night as if something happened yesterday. Instead it might have been a gradual increase over the last 3 months, we don't know because they have only one data point for the last 3 months while thy have 37 data points for the first 3 months of the graph.