this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
-65 points (19.6% liked)

Political Memes

6251 readers
5257 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] philluminati@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you read the page you linked it explicitly says:

Cultural destruction does not suffice, nor does an intention to simply disperse a group

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It also lists specifically in the main points that causing physical or mental harms is right up at #2. You're suggesting that just telling them to GTFO and find someplace else to live is not harmful? Now, I suppose we could just say let them all come to the USA, but we ended up electing someone who made a pretty big promise of starting the largest deportation in history, do I don't see that happening.

[–] philluminati@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I definitely think it’s harmful. I definitely think force and physical harm, and likely some murders would be required to actually remove them. What is being proposed is awful there’s no doubt about that.

But I cannot equate “mental harm” with “genocide”. You’re redefining an incredibly triggering word just so you can use it to attack an enemy. However redefining it is dangerous because it minimises the words true impact. You’re now, in effect, saying that Hitler “upset a few Jews” rather than he committed mass murder. You’re applying genocide to a bunch of places where it only really serves to make the word redundant.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Saying it reasonably fits the definition as established by the UN in no way equates to 'Hitler upset a few jews'.

You can call it what you will, frankly in many ways taking everything one has and throwing them to the wilds is crueler than to just kill them outright.