this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
511 points (98.3% liked)

News

25269 readers
3897 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes don’t work! Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into an SUV and a sedan and crashing into a large concrete barrier.

Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the car’s brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than $23,000 in damages and publicly apologize to the $1.1 trillion company.

Zhang is not the only one to find herself in the crosshairs of Tesla, which is led by Elon Musk, among the richest men in the world and a self-described “ free speech absolutist.” Over the last four years, Tesla has sued at least six car owners in China who had sudden vehicle malfunctions, quality complaints or accidents they claimed were caused by mechanical failures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The brakes in these things have a lot of safety features and logging added to them.

If the brake was pressed, it's easy to prove with the cars logs. It's how most of the unintended acceleration stuff goes.

If you press the brake and the accelerator at the same time the brake will win as well.

She put seals on the doors to prevent Tesla from accessing the interior saying she didnt trust Tesla, and she refused 3rd party independent testing that Tesla offered to pay for.

Nothing about this specific incident helps her credibility at all.

Also, this story is old.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This would be much better with citations.

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chevy hasn’t made those for 40 years!

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Luckily Cessna still makes them

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like I'm missing out on a great joke here.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you did pretty good on that one. I got a chuckle.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

https://insideevs.com/news/505015/tesla-response-china-protestor/

The car eventually went to a local service shop, but Tesla says Zhang sealed the doors so nobody would be able to get inside the car.

Tesla also says she refused an offer to have the car's brakes independently tested by a third party.

From Tesla Directly

On March 6, Ms. Zhang once again declared that she would reject any form of vehicle testing, and requested to return the vehicle and compensate for mental damage, medical expenses, and lost work expenses. In the Tesla store, a banner that reads “Brake Failure” was posted on the car body, and attention was drawn by means of pulling up banners and using speakers to spread Tesla’s negative comments, affecting the normal operating order of the store. Tesla staff have offered to advance the third-party inspection fees several times, but Ms. Zhang has always refused. Because of the greater impact of his “rights protection” behavior, the local police station sent out police officers to provide on-site persuasion on many occasions.”

“Since February, we have been doing our best to actively communicate with Ms. Zhang and her family. We sincerely hope that we can promote vehicle inspection as soon as possible and give a result to the friends who care about Tesla."

Edit: And obviously, this is just Tesla's statements on the matter, but I haven't ever seen anything to contradict their claims, and she lost in court and was forced to apologize. I imagine if you read Chinese you could find more sources or even court documents reiterating the seals/refusal stances.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Independent” “third party” seems unlikely, she made the right call. No brake company wants to be on the bad side of a major auto manufacturer.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay, but what are your expectations when you refuse to let an OEM look at the vehicle after an accident, refuse 3rd party testing, and then go around disrupting events and stores making claims you can't back up and refuse to let anyone to verify?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why didn’t Tesla present its telemetry data? They are the ones suing so the burden of proof is on them.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

She refused access to the car, that level of data probably needs access. Its very low level stuff like dual independent voltages read by the brakes as the pedal is depressed. 100% though it WAS there if they had access to the vehicle.

It also might not even be possible if data sharing is off or without consent.