this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
74 points (100.0% liked)

Games

17605 readers
478 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Wait... How do Trade Secrets work?

I thought that the individuals might be in legal trouble if they violate NDAs or No Compete clauses but that once the "secret" was out it was fair game.

[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The secret was an extraction shooter using DnD Classes. It's very unique and not derivative at all.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This has got to be a South Korea specific thing right? I thought game concepts were generally fair game

[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

I think you're right but Nintendo's trying to change that in its fight against Pal World.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean, didn't matter if you build it on a codebase you yoinked

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago

They didn't yoink the code base. That would be copyright infringement and the judge said they didn't do that.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

If they stole the code that would be copyright infringement.

[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

OpenAI would like a chat

load more comments (4 replies)