this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
75 points (98.7% liked)
Linux Gaming
16392 readers
872 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME
away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
Resources
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Something is definitely off on your system. I've a 7900 XTX (the slightly-higher-end version of that card), and while I don't have the box in front of me, it definitely runs at at least reasonable (60fps+) rates at 2560x1440 on KSP. Might do well above that, dunno. It's definitely not herky-jerky to the level you're seeing, though.
Are you using Wayland or Xorg?
If you run
radeontop
(in Debian trixie, package radeontop) it should tell you various load characteristics. There isn't a GPU-agnostic utility to do this, unless things have changed since last I've looked -- Nvidia and AMD both have their own utilities.Unless you're aiming for AI stuff, where there are some significant benefits, like a large userbase and support for transformers, I'd probably recommend AMD for Linux use.
EDIT:
If you run
glxinfo
on either Xorg (or Wayland, since the emulation layer will handle it), package mesa-utils on Debian trixie, it'll tell you what OpenGL is trying to use. If you're using hardware-accelerated stuff, you'll get something like this:That's been the quick-thumb-in-the-wind test to know whether hardware 3d acceleration is running since just about forever. KSP probably doesn't actually use OpenGL -- I'd guess that it's probably using DirectX going through some emulation layer in Proton to Vulkan -- but if you've got something wonky like no usable 3D driver support for your GPU, that'll show it up.
EDIT2: There's also
vulkaninfo
in (package vulkan-tools in Debian trixie). It'll give you something like:EDIT3: If you're using Xorg and that doesn't show hardware acceleration in use, then the next thing that I'd probably look at is
/var/log/Xorg.0.log
to see what Xorg is saying regarding your GPU. I don't know much about diagnosing Wayland issues, as I've not been using it for all that long. The kernel log may also have interesting messages information (as root,journalctl -kb
ordmesg
) if the problem is at the kernel level.glxinfo | grep Vendor
Vendor: Mesa (0xffffffff)
glxinfo | grep Device
Device: llvmpipe (LLVM 17.0.6, 256 bits) (0xffffffff)
glxinfo | grep "OpenGL rend"
OpenGL renderer string: llvmpipe (LLVM 17.0.6, 256 bits)
Let me know if that's not right. glxinfo dumps a lot of text but those are the only hits for your comment.
When I launch radeontop it prints this before launching, and then the output suggests it isn't working:
Unknown Radeon card. <= R500 won't work, new cards might.
All stats sit at 0.00% except for Memory Clock @ 9%.
EDIT:
xorg, not wayland
vulkan-tools | grep "GPU id":
cat /var/log/Xorg.*.log | grep amd
cat /var/log/Xorg.*.log | grep gpu
Make sure that you actually have permission to that /dev/dri/card1 device. This may be arranged by udev or "video" group membership.
Regarding AMD vs Nvidia, unless you need CUDA you probably made the right choice. This sounds like a config issue and you'd probably be dealing with the same thing with Nvidia too.
Yeah I'm pleasantly surprised by the unanimous responses that AMD seems to be the way to go in this space. At this point I know it's not using my GPU at all, so you are right that nvidia wouldn't be any different