this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

politics

20365 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh well. Who'd ya vote for?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Assuming disabled people must have voted for Trump and therefore get what they deserve is disingenuous.

Worst case scenario, they're unable to meet the physical restrictions of voting imposed in red states and didn't vote. That still doesn't mean they deserve it.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Assuming disabled people must have voted for Trump and therefore get what they deserve is disingenuous.

This isn't at all what I said. I said specifically you can't vote for the "throw all disabled people in a volcano" party and then be surprised when they start throwing disabled people in volcanos...

I'm a person with disabilities, which is precisely why I didn't vote for the "throw all disabled people in a volcano" party... It's not wrong to hold people accountable for how they vote, even if they're disabled. That's not saying "haha, you deserve this!" but rather its "Welcome to adulthood. Decisions have consequences."

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Again, there's no evidence from the article that the disabled people in question voted in ANY WAY, much less that they voted for Trump.

That's why your assumption they did is disingenuous.

If the article were about disabled Trump voters, then you'd have a point. It's not.